Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Denial, Desperation and Dishonesty - Defending Stephen Knightís Nonsense

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post

    The Ripper mystery is already littered with far too much BS.
    Hi Simon.

    I appreciate your concern, but the seller states "guaranteed authentic! Lifetime member of the U.A.C.C."

    I am not sure what the United Armenian Congregational Church has to do with it, but there it is.

    At least he's not an Australian selling a letter describing Kosminski racing around with a pair of barber's scissors.

    But I'm with you on this one. $300 and change buys a lot of pina coladas. Let's stick with the liquid.

    RP

    Comment


    • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
      Was i interpreting the facts as to the accuracy of the doctors reports with Eddows ,Stride and Nichols as correct ? ... or course i was, because they were .


      Now if you want to say that the medical evident and all the scientist on the planet claim the t.o.d in Victorian time was little more than guesswork, hey go for it, yell it from the highest mountain. They might be right in some or even more cases , But DEAD wrong in 3 jack the ripper murders, and thats just a fact. This topic is now ended for me .
      Yet on another thread you appear to have finally agreed the point?
      Regards

      Herlock






      "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

      Comment


      • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
        Oh you must mean simons claim that proves knights research wrong . Is that what your after . ?
        No, you claimed that you could prove that Simonís research was wrong when he disproved Knightís theory. You particularly stated that the hospital that Crook was supposed to have been taken to was actually there when Simon had proved that it wasnít.

        Regards

        Herlock






        "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Purkis View Post
          "In modern English usage, "trolling" may describe the fishing technique of slowly dragging a lure or baited hook from a moving boat"...
          Interesting Purkis
          Regards

          Herlock






          "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
            Hi RJ,

            It was very generous of you to think of me, but I fear you have the wrong person.

            I suggest you forward it to someone who accepts as gospel the 'From Hell' letter, the Maybrick Diary, Dear Boss, Saucy Jacky, G.F. Abberline's Diary, the Macnaghten memorandum, the Swanson marginalia, the 17th September letter, the Royal conspiracy and anything Sir Robert Anderson ever committed to paper.

            The Ripper mystery is already littered with far too much BS.

            Regards,

            Simon
            Simon, you appear to have mistakenly added the Macnaghten Memorandum to your list.

            Just though that Iíd point it out.

            Regards

            Herlock






            "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

            Comment


            • Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post

              Hi Simon.

              I appreciate your concern, but the seller states "guaranteed authentic! Lifetime member of the U.A.C.C."

              I am not sure what the United Armenian Congregational Church has to do with it, but there it is.

              At least he's not an Australian selling a letter describing Kosminski racing around with a pair of barber's scissors.

              But I'm with you on this one. $300 and change buys a lot of pina coladas. Let's stick with the liquid.

              RP
              Hi Roger,

              I read the thread on the Kosminski letter the other day but Iím not up to date with it. The guy that owns it appears to be rather thin skinned and averse to criticism?
              Regards

              Herlock






              "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

              Comment


              • That would be the point that i was right, thank you, your welcome .

                Comment


                • You particularly stated that the hospital that Crook was supposed to have been taken to was actually there when Simon had proved that it wasnít.

                  NOOOOO i didn't particularly state that at all, i said ''dont make me prove it was there''. But again you twist the sentence to change to suit. your very good at that .

                  First prove , then state, thats the order it goes in.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
                    That would be the point that i was right, thank you, your welcome .
                    No. You said this:

                    .
                    Michael, in answer to your question , its a fact that the 3 doctors official inquest statements prove that their opinion in regards to t.o.d was correct and accurate . One cant be sure about dr philipps with the Chapman murder .
                    Which is admitting that I was right all along when I was telling you about the inaccuracy of TOD estimates in the Victorian era.


                    It would help if you used the quote function Fish as its often difficult to see which poster you are responding to.


                    Regards

                    Herlock






                    "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post


                      First prove , then state, thats the order it goes in.
                      Iím getting more and more convinced that your simply a troll!

                      You particularly stated that the hospital that Crook was supposed to have been taken to was actually there when Simon had proved that it wasnít.
                      No!!! For Christís sake Fishy! Why do I have to keep wasting my time explaining the English language and every single childishly simple point to you?

                      Simonís research proved that the hospital didnít exist - do you understand that, has it sunk in or perhaps you might have a cat that explain it to you?

                      You said that you could provide evidence to prove that it did exist.

                      I asked to see that evidence.

                      Please tell me that you understand that.

                      .
                      NOOOOO i didn't particularly state that at all, i said ''dont make me prove it was there''. But again you twist the sentence to change to suit. your very good at that .
                      So why are you questioning it??

                      You said: ''dont make me prove it was there''

                      THIS SENTENCE TO ANYONE SPEAKING ENGLISH MEANS THAT YOU CAN PROVE THAT IT WAS THERE.

                      ASK ANY POSTER ON HERE FISHY.

                      Where am I twisting anything?

                      This is why I find it almost impossible to believe that youíre a genuine poster. Itís just impossible for one person to keep misinterpreting facts and the language and getting so much wrong and then denying it and hoping that no one notices.

                      Regards

                      Herlock






                      "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

                      Comment


                      • your so funny its hilarious ,you still no comment on long v codoash

                        No!!! For Christís sake Fishy! Why do I have to keep wasting my time explaining the English language and every single childishly simple point to you? great dont waste your time, dont reply to my post .. easy .


                        weve been through the interpretation theory , and you got that wrong too .


                        and no im not a troll just a person who is entitled to his right to an opinon on a public forum . thats the end of that topic . now about long v codoash ?

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
                          your so funny its hilarious ,you still no comment on long v codoash

                          No!!! For Christís sake Fishy! Why do I have to keep wasting my time explaining the English language and every single childishly simple point to you? great dont waste your time, dont reply to my post .. easy .


                          weve been through the interpretation theory , and you got that wrong too .


                          and no im not a troll just a person who is entitled to his right to an opinon on a public forum . thats the end of that topic . now about long v codoash ?
                          No itís not the end of that topic!!

                          Youre not going to keep wriggling dishonestly

                          You weíre wrong on Halse.

                          Wrong on Gull.

                          Wrong on TOD estimates in the Victorian era.

                          Stop wittering on about Long and Cadosch. I didnít bring them into the conversation.

                          You claimed to be able to prove that Simon was wrong and that the hospital actually existed.

                          Prove it then Fishy. Show us the evidence.

                          Oh and while youíre at it, what about answering the question that I asked you half a dozen times - what evidence do you have that Gull was interviewed by Abberline over The Whitechapel Murders?


                          Regards

                          Herlock






                          "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

                          Comment


                          • Right on time of death . right on gull and i proved that 100% . Right on j.s retracting his statment, fairclough forward proof of that . AND YES RIGHT ON LONG V CADOSCH WHICH YOUR IGNORING .

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
                              . . [/B]
                              . R[B]ight on time of death
                              Wrong - you said : one canít be sure about Dr Phillips with Chapmans murder.

                              Those are your own words Fishy. How can you now deny them?

                              . right on gull and i proved that 100% .
                              Wrong - Gull suffered a stroke in October 1887 which meant that he became incapable of even continuing his hardly strenuous job of a doctor. If heíd have recovered fully heíd have taken up his job again. But he didnít. Because he couldnít. Murdering and mutilating prostitutes is far more physical than sitting behind a desk in a consulting room.

                              R[B]ight on j.s retracting his statment, fairclough forward proof of that
                              Wrong- Giving an explanation for Sickertís retraction (that we all knew about anyway) is not proof of anything especially when he was involved in a second book which he and the author were promoting as genuine. Evidence, proof, logic, honesty - simply foreign concepts to you.

                              . AND YES RIGHT ON LONG V CADOSCH WHICH YOUR IGNORING
                              Wrong - Iím not ignoring anything because I didnít make any comment on them in the first place. I didnít bring them into the conversation. Youíre using them as a very obvious delaying tactic.


                              Do you realise that others are reading this. Iíll ask again Fishy.

                              1. What evidence do you have that Sir William Gull was interviewed by Abberline over The Whitechapel Murders?

                              2. Where is the evidence, that you claimed to have which proved that Simon was wrong and that the hospital existed where Knight said it did.

                              3. Where is youíre other evidence which proves that the rest of Simonís rebuttal of the Knight fantasy?


                              How long can you keep avoiding this Fishy? Itís becoming embarrassing.
                              Regards

                              Herlock






                              "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

                              Comment


                              • Already had this discussion and proved it already. If you keep ignoring that , thats your problem . i dont particularly care what other people think, its you having this conversation with and youve been proven wrong. so move on nothing to see here end of topic for you .

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X