Patricia Cornwell

[Scott Nelson]

In fact, some of the people with the most posts on these boards are the ones with the least to contribute.

Thank you. I've been complaining about this for years.

[Dan Norder]

First, the meaning of the post is not a riddle. It's absolutely clear to anyone who has paid even the slightest amount of attention to the thread.

Second, Lyn has been a longtime member of these boards in their various incarnations over the years. The fact that she's only posted a few times on the most recent version of the board in no way means she is new or has nothing to contribute. In fact, some of the people with the most posts on these boards are the ones with the least to contribute.

[Jeff Leahy]

Banging your head against a brick wall, Jeff. That's all. I was trying to help you. Before Health & Safety decide to move in, in case you should hurt the wall.

Listen, if you really don't want to stop defending a liar, or fabricator as you prefer they're called, and accusing others of all sorts of thing to cover your tracks in words that make it seem you aren't, I suppose it's best I say no more.

Don't worry, the Casebook has been used to my strange, sometimes very strange posts for a long time. Nothing new, they'll get over it.

Lyn

Urm..very strange..clearly i can not respond to something that says nothing, and seems to hint and apply something that I am completely in the dark about. Would you please be specific. this is not a post its a riddle.

What exactly do you beleive I am defending?

And what exactly do you think I am accusing others of? and whom of those posters do you believe I am accusing?

Do you actually have something of substance to add to this debate...

I must admit I'm confused..you've only ever made 14 posts? None of which show any interest as to the identity of Jack the Ripper.

[Lyn]

Sorry Lyn

What exactly am I giving up? its a very strange post.

Banging your head against a brick wall, Jeff. That's all. I was trying to help you. Before Health & Safety decide to move in, in case you should hurt the wall.

Listen, if you really don't want to stop defending a liar, or fabricator as you prefer they're called, and accusing others of all sorts of thing to cover your tracks in words that make it seem you aren't, I suppose it's best I say no more.

Don't worry, the Casebook has been used to my strange, sometimes very strange posts for a long time. Nothing new, they'll get over it.

Lyn

[Jeff Leahy]

Jeff,

Would you mind if I say something?

Just give it up. You're beating your head against a wall, and sadly becoming quite silly with each responsive post. Give it up now, eh.

I understand, I really do. I had to be told too.

As a nurse I worry, though. Brick walls and banging heads don't really go together well. Just give it up, eh.

Sincerely,

Lyn

Sorry Lyn

What exactly am I giving up? its a very strange post.

[Jeff Leahy]

This Philip Hutchinson video gets everywere and quite rightly so. Look at his other "Grave location vidoe's" they are really well done and quite touching.

Yes I thought i detected the hand of someone who new what they were doing.

You've obviously done Utube before..is there anything else worth watching?

Sorry if Im off thread here..just curious

[Lyn]

Jeff,

Would you mind if I say something?

Just give it up. You're beating your head against a wall, and sadly becoming quite silly with each responsive post. Give it up now, eh.

I understand, I really do. I had to be told too.

As a nurse I worry, though. Brick walls and banging heads don't really go together well. Just give it up, eh.

Sincerely,

Lyn

[Mike Covell]

Absolutely. The only DNA that might tell anyone anything is here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyrN3q9WbK8&feature=related

And the church would never allow access. And the only use would be to identify MJK place of origin, not identify jack.

interestingly the video is correct, the grave isn't an exact marker.

This Philip Hutchinson video gets everywere and quite rightly so. Look at his other "Grave location vidoe's" they are really well done and quite touching.

[Jeff Leahy]

I would tend to think that the most likely DNA to find on that particular knife would be the previous gardening owner's (it seems unlikely that s/he would have used it all those years and not sustained a cut or scrape off of it at some stage), or possibly Don Rumbelow's. Neither would prove anything about old Jack, or Mary Kelly, or any of the others though.

Absolutely. The only DNA that might tell anyone anything is here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyrN3q9WbK8&feature=related

And the church would never allow access. And the only use would be to identify MJK place of origin, not identify jack.

interestingly the video is correct, the grave isn't an exact marker.

[Khanada]

Hello downonwhores

I assume that by the knife your reffering to Don Rumblow's knife currently being shown at the docklands exhibission?

I dont know if you know the history of the knife. But for many years it was kept as a gardening implement in someone's back garden..

I dont see what DNA you would hope to extract from it? The victims or Jacks?

I would tend to think that the most likely DNA to find on that particular knife would be the previous gardening owner's (it seems unlikely that s/he would have used it all those years and not sustained a cut or scrape off of it at some stage), or possibly Don Rumbelow's. Neither would prove anything about old Jack, or Mary Kelly, or any of the others though.

[Jeff Leahy]

She got a pretty hefty advance from the publisher that was probably right up there just to start with, and then she donated the Sickert paintings she bought with most of that money to a university -- getting a big tax write off and publicity for doing so. Considering that the publisher is still willing to release another copy of the book I don't think you have to worry that she lost any money.

Its a strange day, I actually agree with the Norder?

Money makes money as they say, and the damaged painting was insured..its hard to believe she made a loss..not that i have anything against people making money..my favorite program is the Apprentice.

[Jeff Leahy]

I saw this sometime back and I was sick in my mouth! It's bloody awful, like some sort of mad granny porn!

I don't think it is Mike, I think its a serious religeous message, she quotes a church at the beginning but i don't know for sure, its quite bizarre.

[Mike Covell]

PS I was also trying to turn up some new info on Cornwall and came across this bizarre video on Utube...I cant work out if its some odd religious sect or soft porn for people with a cleavage fetish...Truely Bizarre but Patricia related, I think

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Wwfi...eature=related

I saw this sometime back and I was sick in my mouth! It's bloody awful, like some sort of mad granny porn!

[Dan Norder]

I wondered if she sold enough copies of her first ripper book to make up for the 6 million dollars she lost.

She got a pretty hefty advance from the publisher that was probably right up there just to start with, and then she donated the Sickert paintings she bought with most of that money to a university -- getting a big tax write off and publicity for doing so. Considering that the publisher is still willing to release another copy of the book I don't think you have to worry that she lost any money.

[Jeff Leahy]

It's a war of Patrician then.

I, I cap'in