Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Curious Case of History vs. James Maybrick

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dane_F
    replied
    I'm just posting to let everyone know I survived the night though it was touch and go for a few moments.

    I wish everyone success wherever they are headed today.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeilG
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    I should have known... is that near BamBam.
    That's the one!!

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by NeilG View Post
    http://binged.it/1DS3E5W

    Just South East of Peebles.

    Hope that helps
    I should have known... is that near BamBam.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeilG
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Where the heck is Innerleithen, I know Google Maps.
    Map multiple locations, get transit/walking/driving directions, view live traffic conditions, plan trips, view satellite, aerial and street side imagery. Do more with Bing Maps.


    Just South East of Peebles.

    Hope that helps

    Leave a comment:


  • NeilG
    replied
    Originally posted by Bridewell View Post
    Welcome to Casebook!

    I'm of the same mind with regard to the authenticity or otherwise of the 'diary'. In fairness to Iconoclast though, it has to be pointed out that the admission of forgery was retracted at one point. No-one has ever come up with a convincing explanation of why Maybrick, if he wrote it, would do so in a scrap book with pages torn out of it. The only explanation of the use of a scrap book for this purpose which convinces me is that it was necessary to use something which could be dated to the late 1880's. The scrap book was the only item available to the writer from that time period (ergo the writer was someone other than Maybrick).
    Thanks very much Bridewell

    I wasn't aware the statement was retracted, blimey I do need to get up to speed.

    I agree regarding only available time accurate paper, although was it to be the real article, writing said diary in a tatty unassuming book would in effect lessen suspicion or even curiosity. Which in double form would ascertain that such a book would be thrown out as trash without being looked at upon the demise of the writer.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Iconoclast View Post
    So you did!

    Okay, but Dane's 'Dane is ill' was still a cracker.

    I'm off to Innerleithen now - yes, home to Jack's 'Brother in trade' letter - and it's about 300 miles away and it's raining. Just what you want!

    Icon
    Where the heck is Innerleithen, I know Google Maps.

    Leave a comment:


  • Iconoclast
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    But I said Dale [of Van Gogh fame] not Dane of "I am ill" fame.
    So you did!

    Okay, but Dane's 'Dane is ill' was still a cracker.

    I'm off to Innerleithen now - yes, home to Jack's 'Brother in trade' letter - and it's about 300 miles away and it's raining. Just what you want!

    Icon

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Iconoclast View Post
    Yes, I think Dane won Post of the Day if not Post of the Week/Month/Year. His 'JTR I am Not' was good, but his 'Dane is ill' (and the cross) was a cracker.
    But I said Dale [of Van Gogh fame] not Dane of "I am ill" fame.

    Leave a comment:


  • Iconoclast
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Well it seems you're not alone there when it comes to Jack. People see all sorts of things in all sorts of places in this case [but think Dale took the cake].
    Yes, I think Dane won Post of the Day if not Post of the Week/Month/Year. His 'JTR I am Not' was good, but his 'Dane is ill' (and the cross) was a cracker.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Iconoclast View Post
    Hi Hatchett,

    The judge is allowing a large amount of discretion in Her court at the minute - and long may she do so!

    Icon
    Ahhhhhhh a female Judge, you may get a conviction yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • Iconoclast
    replied
    Originally posted by Hatchett View Post
    Hi,

    Not to be picky, but you started this thread as submission in a court of law, but now you are resorting to blind speculation which would never been admitted into a court.

    I think by doing this you have to admit that Maybrick has to be innocent, in law and in reasonable application of the law.

    Best wishes.
    Hi Hatchett,

    The judge is allowing a large amount of discretion in Her court at the minute - and long may she do so!

    Icon

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Dane_F View Post
    I will see whatever I want to see good sir!! Thank you very much.
    Well it seems you're not alone there when it comes to Jack. People see all sorts of things in all sorts of places in this case [but think Dale took the cake].

    Leave a comment:


  • Iconoclast
    replied
    Originally posted by Dane_F View Post
    I appreciate your good-naturedness about it all. If we ever stumble across each other at a pub I'll buy you a beer.
    Indeed, and it is of course Friday night tonight so after a long week I shall raise a bottle of local ale to your fine GSG-fun and toast your good self!

    Icon

    Leave a comment:


  • Iconoclast
    replied
    Originally posted by Bridewell View Post
    Does the vaunted Maybrick Diary go into detail about his clever deception with the GSG?
    Sadly no, Bridewell. He pre-dates it with [from memory] 'if a jew they want then a jew I shall be' and he post-dates it with [also from memory] 'I wonder if they liked my funny jewish joke?'.

    Not exactly a smoking gun, I accept.

    Icon

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    Does the vaunted Maybrick Diary go into detail about his clever deception with the GSG?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X