Florence The Ripperess

[John Wheat]

I understand all the reasons for Florence not being Jack the Ripper.

What I'm not so sure about is how a diary written by anyone after Maybrick's death could be considered proof that he wasn't, or make the very idea absurd.

If someone faked a diary portraying William Bury as Jack, would it be proof that he wasn't? Might it depend on how badly or how recently you judged it to have been faked? Would your favourite chant have been: "Rubbish! The diary was odds-on faked by a loser, so the idea that Bury was Jack is absurd"?

IMHO, as an unidentified serial offender, Jack was more likely to have been one of the many thousands of men who drew no attention to themselves at the time of the murders, than among the few names that were either crossed off the list or could not be connected to more than one crime scene or victim at most. The police were falling over themselves to catch the killer but, to their credit, they didn't collectively go for the low hanging fruit or pick the lowest one to hang for a series of murders. There were also many false Jacks, who were disturbed enough to 'confess' to the murders, with no credible evidence against them and no reason to believe their stories.

Love,

Caz
X

But the diary was in all likelihood written by Anne and Mike Barrett. Bury may well have been Jack. If a diary turned up reportedly by Bury claiming to be Jack then it might strengthen the case for him being the Ripper however of it was a phony diary created by a conman and his wife it would not have any bearing on wether Bury was the Ripper or not.

[Lombro2]

Bury can’t make it out the front door.

Florence is way more cold-blooded. They said she had vacant eyes.

[The Baron]

Florence Maybrick is a far better suspect than William Bury. She had the motive, the means, and the intelligence. It’s not even a debate.



The Baron

[Herlock Sholmes]

But the diary was in all likelihood written by Anne and Mike Barrett. Bury may well have been Jack. If a diary turned up reportedly by Bury claiming to be Jack then it might strengthen the case for him being the Ripper however of it was a phony diary created by a conman and his wife it would not have any bearing on wether Bury was the Ripper or not.

The subject has been reduced to this John. A murderer, mutilator, violent past, drunkard, knife carrier, linked to prostitutes, troubled early life, criminal, living in the vicinity and on the other hand a woman raised in a genteel manner who was falsely accused of poisoning whilst living in Liverpool! Would you have believed the subject could sink so low? What an embarrassment when people read the content. It’s a sad state of affairs.

[c.d.]

I mentioned this before in the diary thread. According to the author of the book Did She Kill Him the police damn near tore the house apart in searching for clues as to Maybrick's death. Make of it what you will.

c.d.

[John Wheat]

Florence Maybrick is a far better suspect than William Bury. She had the motive, the means, and the intelligence. It’s not even a debate.



The Baron

Absolutely ridiculous post.