The Diary—Old Hoax or New?

[Iconoclast]

Who’s a pretty boy then?

Honestly, ero b, my decision to block the child's posts (the first and only time I have ever done so in nigh-on 20 years of reading the Casebook) was the best thing I have done this year (Jack-related).

I strongly recommend it to you and anyone else who is simply irritated by his infantile repetition and bleating about things unproven as if they were fact.

Ike
Resting in Peace

[John Wheat]

Who’s a pretty boy then?

Immaturity.

[erobitha]

It's pointless trying to educate the foolish. You are a troll by the way blindly accepting all the bullshit about Maybrick.

Who’s a pretty boy then?

[John Wheat]

Who's a pretty boy then?

It's pointless trying to educate the foolish. You are a troll by the way blindly accepting all the bullshit about Maybrick.

[erobitha]

The Barretts wrote the diary and the Watch markings were not written by James Maybrick.

Who's a pretty boy then?

[erobitha]

Anyone who thinks that Maybrick was the Ripper is a fool. I have now read the article you wrote it's wrong and extremely bias.

Why am I not surprised by the lack of counter arguments?

Okay, John, time to get back on your perch. Who's a pretty boy, then?

[John Wheat]

The Barretts wrote the diary and the Watch markings were not written by James Maybrick.

[John Wheat]

This response to me sums everything up about you on this thread, John.

Anyone who thinks that Maybrick was the Ripper is a fool. I have now read the article you wrote it's wrong and extremely bias.

[erobitha]

Why would I read all that bullshit? It's clearly wrong. This is the joke part of Ripperology.

This response to me sums everything up about you on this thread, John.

[John Wheat]

I wrote a detailed blog with handwriting examples:

https://jayhartley.com/the-inconvenient-truth-of-the-maybrick-watch/

I look forward to your detailed counter-arguments. I guess I might be waiting some time, though.

Why would I read all that bullshit? It's clearly wrong. This is the joke part of Ripperology.

[erobitha]

Whereas you are an example of the blind leading the blind.

If you think childish antics shuts down the debate, then I guess maybe it is you who needs the eye test.

[erobitha]

You still have not given any reasons as to why the watch markings are genuine.

I wrote a detailed blog with handwriting examples:

https://jayhartley.com/the-inconvenient-truth-of-the-maybrick-watch/

I look forward to your detailed counter-arguments. I guess I might be waiting some time, though.

[John Wheat]

To educate means to impart some knowledge. Something you have severely lacked in this discussion.

Whereas you are an example of the blind leading the blind.

[John Wheat]

You clearly think the Barretts wrote the diary (they didn't) so who do you think "forged" the scratches? Robbie or Albert Johnson?

If so, one very simple question, why?

You still have not given any reasons as to why the watch markings are genuine.

[erobitha]

I'm just trying to educate the foolish.

To educate means to impart some knowledge. Something you have severely lacked in this discussion.