Hello Debs,
Thank you for your reply and in connection with the 1887 case, the 1889 case and the 1891 case I am in total greement with you.
That is why I concentrated, in my last post on the 1877 and 1879 cases, as shown above. I still believe that we need a total oversight over all movements of all known Le Grands and aliases in one list so as to be able to differentiate between them all.
best wishes
Phil
Thank you for your reply and in connection with the 1887 case, the 1889 case and the 1891 case I am in total greement with you.
That is why I concentrated, in my last post on the 1877 and 1879 cases, as shown above. I still believe that we need a total oversight over all movements of all known Le Grands and aliases in one list so as to be able to differentiate between them all.
best wishes
Phil

I'm still learning and Tom doesn't have his sources (lost in his old computer crush), so you can mainly depend on Debs... Plus, of lately, Rob Clack has massively began to dig out sources! Not to mention the newspaper find by Mike Covell (identified by Howard Brown) linking Le Grand to the Ripper investigation. (The latter is also discussed in Examiner 2.)

Comment