Perfect mDNA match is proof of fraud

[GUT]

In case you don't know puff = BS.

[mklhawley]

Puff it is then. Thanks GUT

[GUT]

Well you know my view.

I have viewed literally hundreds of DNA reports in paternity matters that is is Mr "X" the father of child "B". So pretty close relationships the highest I have ever seen [and remember we are talking nuclear DNA here] is 99.9999% or 1 chance in a million that it's wrong.

So 100% nope, don't think there's a DNA lab in the world that would sign off to that.

However I don't think that it's fraud just "puff" to garner interest.

[mklhawley]

Am I wrong on this point?

[mklhawley]

Hi all,

According to the article, Karen Miller's (maternal descendent of Eddowes) mDNA is a 100% perfect match with Eddowes and Matilda's (maternal descendent of Kosminski) mDNA is a perfect match with Kosminski.

It is physically impossible for the mDNA of a descendent to be a perfect match with an ancestor. A generational mDNA mutation rate of 3 X 10 to the minus 5 guarantees this.

A 100% perfect match CAN ONLY MEAN ONE THING, the mDNA on the shawl is the same at the living descendent's, i.e., it's a fraud.

...unless the article lied and it wasn't a 100% perfect match. If so, falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

Sincerely,

Mike