Perfect mDNA match is proof of fraud

[Mr Lucky]

Am I wrong on this point?

Yes.

A generational mDNA mutation rate of 3 X 10 to the minus 5 guarantees this

Chance of mutation per generation = 0.00003%

0.00003% doesn't guarantee anything mutating during the 3? to 5? generations under consideration.

A 100% perfect match CAN ONLY MEAN ONE THING, the mDNA on the shawl is the same at the living descendent's, i.e., it's a fraud.

Even if it were wrong (and it isn't) that doesn't mean it's fraud.

[lynn cates]

premise

Hello Mrs P. Thanks.

I'm with you. I suppose that is the premise of the OP?

Cheers.
LC

[paul g]

Lynn, if the DNA was a recent deposit, I would think it should be a 'perfect match'..........only if it was similiar, would it be convincing. One think to keep in mind is the owner of the shawl was a prostitute, so I would think there could be a lot of men's DNA on the shawl. That doesn't make the the guy a murderer.


Eileen

That's a good point. So we are now being led to believe that miss Eddowes only took the shawl out with her one night and it just so happens it is the one night she bumps into jack.
Or
She bought or was given the shawl that during that day and it was the first time she had taking it with her.

If that is the case I think the shawl is a unlucky one.

[Mrsperfect]

Lynn, if the DNA was a recent deposit, I would think it should be a 'perfect match'..........only if it was similiar, would it be convincing. One think to keep in mind is the owner of the shawl was a prostitute, so I would think there could be a lot of men's DNA on the shawl. That doesn't make the the guy a murderer.


Eileen

[pinkmoon]

I'm going ring shop later to enquire if they stock fake dog poo should be Interesting

[MrBarnett]

Pink ,

I never had you down as a yoyophobe.

MrB

[pinkmoon]

Hi all,

According to the article, Karen Miller's (maternal descendent of Eddowes) mDNA is a 100% perfect match with Eddowes and Matilda's (maternal descendent of Kosminski) mDNA is a perfect match with Kosminski.

It is physically impossible for the mDNA of a descendent to be a perfect match with an ancestor. A generational mDNA mutation rate of 3 X 10 to the minus 5 guarantees this.

A 100% perfect match CAN ONLY MEAN ONE THING, the mDNA on the shawl is the same at the living descendent's, i.e., it's a fraud.

...unless the article lied and it wasn't a 100% perfect match. If so, falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

Sincerely,

Mike

I won't waffle on but the one thing has made me doubt all this is quite a simple one the man behind all of this has recently opened a ripper shop that sells a lot of interesting things including an authentic very collectable hand crafted made from the finest plastic that mankind can provide yoyo.check at the website www.jacktherippertoursandstore.co.uk

[lynn cates]

not wrong

Hello Mike. No, not wrong.

Frankly, how could it EVER be shown that these "descendants" did not deposit their DNA recently?

Cheers.
LC

[Limehouse]

Thanks GUT.

[GUT]

Is it known whether these tests were carried out using the LCN DNA testing method?

Short answer no not known at this point of time.

[Limehouse]

Is it known whether these tests were carried out using the LCN DNA testing method?

[Barnaby]

Is the shawl made from hemp? Can we smoke it?

[GUT]

I thought 'Puff' was a magic dragon. But so is this shawl.

Mike

WHAT???

The Shawl is a Magic Dragon, now t all makes sense.

[The Good Michael]

I thought 'Puff' was a magic dragon. But so is this shawl.

Mike

[wolfie1]

In case you don't know puff = BS.