Hi Everyone,
I have been doing speculating recently concerning the debate about whether Schwartz was the witness who Anderson alleges picked out a Jewish suspect but wouldn't testify against him in court since he didn't want another Jew's death on his hands. Here is something that has come to my mind recently though. First of all, both Kosminski and Schwartz both could not speak any English, at least not fluently. Kosminski could only speak Polish and maybe some Yiddish. Schwartz could only speak Hungarian and also maybe some Yiddish (I can't say for certain if either of them could speak Yiddish but I do know many Jewish immigrants spoke this language in the East End in order to socialize with each other). Now, that being said, let us assume that, for the sake of argument, that Schwartz is in fact the witness whom Anderson is referring to and let's say that Kosminski is the man that he saw with Liz Stride that night. So, if Kosminski was in fact the man that attacked Stride, then prior to the attack, they probably were not conversing in English, since Kosminski did not speak English and Liz Stride did know some Yiddish, we would have to assume that they were maybe conversing in Yiddish prior to the attack. Now, if Schwartz was himself fluent in some Yiddish (again I am merely speculating this; I can't say if he was or not), wouldn't he have picked up a little bit more of the conversation between Stride & Kosminski other than "Lipski" being yelled out to him. Another thing is this...if we assume that the attacker (in this scenario, Kosminski) did in fact yell out "Lipski" and it was aimed at Schwartz and not to Pipeman across the street, then why would he, a Jew, yell out an anti-Semetic slur towards Schwartz, another fellow Jew who was said to have a "very Jewish-looking" appearance? Again, this is merely a scenario but one must take these questions into account if Kosminski was, in fact, the attacker and Schwartz was the witness.
I have been doing speculating recently concerning the debate about whether Schwartz was the witness who Anderson alleges picked out a Jewish suspect but wouldn't testify against him in court since he didn't want another Jew's death on his hands. Here is something that has come to my mind recently though. First of all, both Kosminski and Schwartz both could not speak any English, at least not fluently. Kosminski could only speak Polish and maybe some Yiddish. Schwartz could only speak Hungarian and also maybe some Yiddish (I can't say for certain if either of them could speak Yiddish but I do know many Jewish immigrants spoke this language in the East End in order to socialize with each other). Now, that being said, let us assume that, for the sake of argument, that Schwartz is in fact the witness whom Anderson is referring to and let's say that Kosminski is the man that he saw with Liz Stride that night. So, if Kosminski was in fact the man that attacked Stride, then prior to the attack, they probably were not conversing in English, since Kosminski did not speak English and Liz Stride did know some Yiddish, we would have to assume that they were maybe conversing in Yiddish prior to the attack. Now, if Schwartz was himself fluent in some Yiddish (again I am merely speculating this; I can't say if he was or not), wouldn't he have picked up a little bit more of the conversation between Stride & Kosminski other than "Lipski" being yelled out to him. Another thing is this...if we assume that the attacker (in this scenario, Kosminski) did in fact yell out "Lipski" and it was aimed at Schwartz and not to Pipeman across the street, then why would he, a Jew, yell out an anti-Semetic slur towards Schwartz, another fellow Jew who was said to have a "very Jewish-looking" appearance? Again, this is merely a scenario but one must take these questions into account if Kosminski was, in fact, the attacker and Schwartz was the witness.
Comment