Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Has anybody seen this before?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Versa
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Did this ever get cleared up? was it a mistake?

    Seconded, I'd like to know if this was cleared up too....

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Phil Carter View Post
    Hello all,

    You will be pleased to know that I have traced (with some help from Chris) the owner of the web site and have been in communication via email.
    Due to several difficulties, she is unable to present the cross reference material from where she got the above mentions of both Hutchinson and Kelly. But there are positive things.
    1. The George Hutchinson mentioned is the same one appearing under Geo. Hutchinson, hence the (1).
    2. The Mary Kelly, aka O'Brien, is indeed the Mary Kelly of 13, Dorset Street, for under the "K" sectrion she appears three times..

    KELLY (1) MARY JANE AKA MARY JANE O'BRIEN BORN LIMERICK AUGUST 1865
    KELLY (1) MARY JANE LIVED IN ROOM 13,MILLERS COURT, DORSET ST 1888
    KELLY (1) MARY JANE BURIED ST PATRICK'S RC CEMETERY, LEYTONSTONE 1888.

    So I'm sorry Scarletpimpernel, you appear to be wrong this time. However I don't hold out much hope, yet one never knows, because of the mention below...

    This kind lady has also provided me with a long list of every book or reference she used for the entire web site, and in here, she says, the cross references occur. She is also looking kindly through the books, in her own time, to help us.

    I have the list on an email, if anyone has either a large library at home, or access to one such, and if they wish to try to help and cross reference this information, I would be most obliged.
    I will send the email to them. Just send me a pm. Many thanks.

    with best wishes

    Phil


    Did this ever get cleared up? was it a mistake?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jonnieola
    replied
    Yup. The link on the first post on the thread now appears dead. Pity.

    Leave a comment:


  • joelhall
    replied
    Stepney folk, page 1, post 1. Been away for quite a while and never saw it when posted and now it seems broken.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    Joel, what link?

    Leave a comment:


  • joelhall
    replied
    Sorry the link doesn't work, can anyone give me the details of what it says?

    Cheers,

    Joel

    Leave a comment:


  • j.r-ahde
    replied
    Hello you all!

    The main trouble with Hutchinson probably is, that all they wanted at the time, was his testimony!

    All the best
    Jukka

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Don't wanna go there.
    White trousers tonight.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    David,

    It's on the Hutch thread in black and white, in blood red, and in vomit green

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Who the hell are you alluding to, Mike ?
    Must have missed something important...

    Amitiés,
    David

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by DVV View Post
    imo, MJK is more likely to be MJK than Hutch to be Hutch...
    Though we know Hutch from later censuses of course.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Hi all,

    imo, MJK is more likely to be MJK than Hutch to be Hutch...

    There was a very sensible post above, about Irish people and census...

    Amitiés,
    David

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Jukka,
    I am still looking into it... no result as yet.. I dont hold out hope..but you never know eh?

    best wishes

    Phil

    Leave a comment:


  • j.r-ahde
    replied
    Hello Dave!

    Well, if the O'Brien connection had been confirmed, the numerous "Who was she, really?" about Mary Kelly wouldn't exist on these boards, would they?!

    About the role of mr. Hutchinson, to be quite honest;

    I don't know, what to think, really!

    All the best
    Jukka

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by Phil Carter View Post
    Because if THAT is true, Hutchinson becomes not a believable witness, but, I suggest, a prime suspect, for Kelly's murder at least.

    Phil
    Hi Phil,

    Hutch has never been a believable witness - in spite of Abberline's opinion.
    The very fact that he came forward after the inquest and Lewis testimony is suspicious.
    He was "Wideawake Man", wasn't he ?
    And thus a prime suspect for Kelly's murder.

    Amitiés,
    David

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X