Hi Halomanuk,
I suppose we can't...
Hutch is the witness that drive people mad.
The Great Miller's Court Battle is even greater than expected.
No holds barred.
Amitiés,
David
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hutch in the 1911 Census?
Collapse
X
-
Can we cut out the slanderous words on here ?
There is no need to get personal on this and call people 'liars' on a chat forum.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ben View Postthen I suppose the logic goes that BB should be hurling the same accusations at Crystal for failing to actually engage in mud-wresting? Or might it be more circumspect to fathom that maybe - just maybe - she was kidding?
Ben...Crystal hasn't told you???? I really have "seen her credentials" and thoroughly lovely they are!
Although i am sure others will say "she would say that."
Leave a comment:
-
Fisherman,
The number of times you've expressed the intention to leave the thread without following through is nothing short of astonishing. When Crystal referred to "what he said", there is no doubt whatsoever that she was referring to "what he said" in his initial letter, as translated by her Swedish friend, and which, true to her word, she posted in "due course". This was entirely unrelated to her light-hearted comment about being on the phone to Leander. If you want to accuse her of being a mean-spirited liar on the basis of the latter remark (in a sort of last ditch "I know you are but what am I?" attempt) then I suppose the logic goes that BB should be hurling the same accusations at Crystal for failing to actually engage in mud-wrestling? Or might it be more circumspect to fathom that maybe - just maybe - she was kidding?
Bye Fisherman.Last edited by Ben; 05-08-2009, 05:19 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fisherman View PostI will have no further dealings with any of you on this issue - it is detrimental to the mental health.
Fisherman
Only to those who are already apparently insane...no names mentioned.
Leave a comment:
-
Ben writes:
"No, Fisherman.
Here is what Crystal said:
"As for Leander, well, I will post what he said in due course."
She was, of course, referring to "what he said" in his initial latter, as translated by her Swedish friend."
I think not, Ben. But there is always post 2037 if you feel very uncertain:
"OH
Hang on... Leander on the phone....
__________________
Clear as Mud.."
Now, I think it is time to wawe goodbye to the collected indecency of this thread. The lies, the smokescreens, the stupidity and all the rest of this farce. It is a complete disgrace, and that owes to the complete rubbish that has been served on your behalf, seconded by a number of ecually clouded minds and judgements, no-one named, and no-one forgotten.
I will have no further dealings with any of you on this issue - it is detrimental to the mental health.
Fisherman
Leave a comment:
-
Michael
that comment was a little below the belt dont you think?
I think it's plain that document examiners can't really give professional opinions when they havent actually seen the documents to do so, don't you?
Leave a comment:
-
No, Fisherman.
Here is what Crystal said:
"As for Leander, well, I will post what he said in due course."
She was, of course, referring to "what he said" in his initial latter, as translated by her Swedish friend. And true to her word, she did produce "what he said" in due course, hence the appearance of that translation today.Last edited by Ben; 05-08-2009, 04:52 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Crystal,
I have faith that you're a liar. Therefore, I believe Fisherman. It's as simple as anything... as you even.
Mike
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedWell, that's lovely Mike
But it isn't a matter for faith, is it?
Leave a comment:
-
Fisherman,
I believe you completely. Why someone would deceive is beyond me. You haven't done that. Trust me. I have faith in you on this.
Mike
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedLeaving so soon, Fish?
Oh Dear.
Leave a comment:
-
I will make one more point before I leave this thread. It concerns the core of this discussion - who lies, who twistes, who tells the truth, who has honest intentions?
Crystal, or a friend of hers, called Frank Leander, to check my veracity. So she tells us. She is not willing, however to share what came out of that conversation: "As for Leander, well, I will post what he said in due course", she says.
That relates to my post where I said that Crystals allegations that I was responsible for numerous faulty statements were left unsubstantiated, and where I said that it seemed nothing had come from the call she had made, that could point to any dishonesty from either Leander or me.
I have now checked with Leander if he has received the call Crystal claims was made, and where she will relate the results in due time. It now emerges that NO call was made - he has not had anything to do in any form in this errand other than with me.
So Crystal has been intentionally misleading us all here - at least I can find no other explanation.
In light of this, I think that Crystal may not be the best of sources when it comes to pointing out who should be ashamed of themselves and who need not be.
Fisherman
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Crystal View PostDoes it double up as a dining room?
Mike
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedDoes it double up as a dining room?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: