Hutch in the 1911 Census?

[Ben]

Hi everyone,

I'm just smooching with Leander.

You can check to verify.

[Fisherman]

Crystal:

"Your credibility is in grave doubt"

It should be, Crystal, since I lied about that telephone ca... No, wait, that was not me, was it?

Fisherman

[Fisherman]

Babybird:

"You wouldn't ascribe it to the mods just being busy having lives and doing important things would you?"

If you had read my posts, I opened up for that possibility, Babybird. Apparently you did not - or you just decided to try and scora a cheap point.

As for apologies, I owe you no such thing. The reason I said you fabricated was that you did exactly that, as you should know full well.

Fisherman

[DVV]

Two good news, Crystal.

Amitiés,
David

Hi David

No, I didn't mean to give the impression that I wouldn't view the contested documents. Of course, as I said so, I will.

I simply have no desire to go around in futile and ever-decreasing circles with Fish.

So I won't.

[DVV]

The pity is that these exchanges have rendered further debate on this thread difficult to achieve with any reasonable detachment.
I, for one, am done. And unlike Fish, I do mean it.

Hi Crystal,

now that everybody has expressed his amateur opinion about the signatures, what can we do except waiting for experts' opinions for further discussions ?

You're an expert, and we're therefore awaiting your conclusions.

Amitiés,
David

[DVV]

Oh, he didn't see the signatures then, eh?

Tana is omniscient, omnipotent, omnidirectional, Mike.

Amitiés,
David

I agree with Sam-it is a pity that this thread has degenarated into what amounts to a public brawl: and we can't even claim to be drunk..just disorderly.

Still, it remains true that most firing arrows around here have done so in response to repetitive and unwarranted provocation, most often by Fish, who does appear to consider that personal attack is par for the course in the course of promoting his view.

Of course, there will be those who object to being branded a liar, a 'parrott' or such in public, which seems fair enough to me.

The pity is that these exchanges have rendered further debate on this thread difficult to achieve with any reasonable detachment.

I, for one, am done. And unlike Fish, I do mean it.

[babybird67]

i have one word for you, Mike....

Oh, he didn't see the signatures then, eh?

Incorrigible!

[The Good Michael]

But he'll still be our coach.
And he told me that he would be very surprised if Toppy was Hutch. The only doubt he has is about possible family ties in Essex.

Oh, he didn't see the signatures then, eh?

[DVV]

I was talking about the long Fish/Ben battles.
Wait! Tana can't be retiring, can he?

Mike,
you should appreciate it, the movie's really great. The more Fish has enemies, the more dangerous he is.
A heavy rain of 10kg posts.
Have you seen how he sends them in the morning, then side steps, go fishing, and comes back more furious ?
As to Tana, yes, he will retire, and next week I'll keep my eyes wide open on him.
But he'll still be our coach.
And he told me that he would be very surprised if Toppy was Hutch. The only doubt he has is about possible family ties in Essex.

Amitiés,
David

[The Good Michael]

That wasn't a post of refutation, Mike.

No, I wasn't talking about your post. I was talking about the long Fish/Ben battles. Your posts are always short and to the point. A beautiful thing in the Hutchinson world. Let's go IRISH and British Lions.

Cheers,

Mike

Wait! Tana can't be retiring, can he?

[DVV]

That wasn't a post of refutation, Mike.
Yours is good example of what went on here.
In fact, the title of this thread should be: "Come and agree with us".
Tana was marvelous tonight (Dax-Toulon 12-22).
Next week I'll see him playing for the last time.
Tout a une fin, hélas, mon bon Mike - except this thread.

Amitiés,
David

[The Good Michael]

You're both right, Halomanuk and Sam,
but who shoot first ?

Every time I read one of those posts of refutation that drone on past 20 lines of text, I want to shoot the writer, and then myself. I don't want to shoot you because you keep the rugby thread alive.

Mike

[DVV]

You're both right, Halomanuk and Sam,
but who shoot first ?
How many times have we read replies such as: "You must be blind. Is it glasses or a dog that you need ?", or: "You say so cos you're a fanatic Hutcher (Hutchite?)...", or : "My eyes tell me the truth and I see no need to discuss about experts."

Amitiés,
David