Originally posted by Harry D
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I think I have found him.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Postwell apparently he knows Bowyer whoever he is LOL
Comment
-
Originally posted by RockySullivan View PostI don't know I think he's making it up as he goes a long. I never heard him mention bowyer until we started talking about how he was in the the court that night and then all of a sudden he's central to theory
Regards Pierre
Comment
-
Blimey, I've not logged on for some time and this thread sparked my interest for a while...until around page 40... Has Pierre found him yet? It's difficult to tell with all these other distractions, and I might have missed it, or do we still have to wait a year? Perhaps someone will kindly let me know, so we can all move on....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Amanda Sumner View PostBlimey, I've not logged on for some time and this thread sparked my interest for a while...until around page 40... Has Pierre found him yet? It's difficult to tell with all these other distractions, and I might have missed it, or do we still have to wait a year? Perhaps someone will kindly let me know, so we can all move on....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harry D View PostWhy are people continuing to indulge this obvious wind-up?
Or because Pierre Ps people off with his rubbish and changing his position every few minutes..G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
Originally posted by belinda View PostI'm agreeing with you. Everybody stop encouraging this
It was mildly amusing at first, but I can't believe people are still hanging on Pierre's every word.
If he has a legitimate theory, then he would do what most armchair detectives do, contact the resident experts, canvas opinion on the forums, write a book of his own, or some combination of all three. The fact he keeps stringing this out tells me that he's making this up as he goes along and getting a real kick out of the attention everyone's affording him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harry D View PostAh.
It was mildly amusing at first, but I can't believe people are still hanging on Pierre's every word.
If he has a legitimate theory, then he would do what most armchair detectives do, contact the resident experts, canvas opinion on the forums, write a book of his own, or some combination of all three. The fact he keeps stringing this out tells me that he's making this up as he goes along and getting a real kick out of the attention everyone's affording him.
What exactly is a "legitimate theory"?
Is it in all the books that has been written about Jack the Ripper without finding him?
Regards Pierre
Comment
-
Dear all,
I said earlier this week I would not reply to this mans posts any more. and this is not a reply to any post..
New threads every few days are started by this person.
These threads bring up same faintly ridiculous ideas, yet he tells all of us that he is only here to unburden himself.
He has told us he is a scientist but refuses to say in what discipline, he has made disparaging remarks at peoples education and qualifications.
At least twice he has taken sarcasm at face value and thanked posters for agreeing with him
it is interesting that he often attacks those who write books on the subject, in fact he appears very bitter about those who do, i wonder why?
At least those writers have had a real theory, even if many of them are extremely weak, and published a name, he has not and I believe he cannot.
In case others have not noticed he now often uses the Royal "we" and has even started to refer to himself in the third person. so be it, it is his right.
However everybody else has the right to ignore him and this SHOULD be done now.
I IMPLORE you all to not enter into debate with this person. he appears to be intent on damaging the study of the Whitechapel murders and this site in particular.
if however he does come up with a name and a theory then all of the rest of us are wrong, so be it.Last edited by Elamarna; 12-05-2015, 02:56 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View PostDear all,
I said earlier this week I would not reply to this mans posts any more. and this is not a reply to any post..
New threads every few days are started by this person.
These threads bring up same faintly ridiculous ideas, yet he tells all of us that he is only here to unburden himself.
He has told us he is a scientist but refuses to say in what discipline, he has made disparaging remarks at peoples education and qualifications.
At least twice he has taken sarcasm at face value and thanked posters for agreeing with him
it is interesting that he often attacks those who write books on the subject, in fact he appears very bitter about those who do, i wonder why?
At least those writers have had a real theory, even if many of them are extremely weak, and published a name, he has not and I believe he cannot.
In case others have not noticed he now often uses the Royal "we" and has even started to refer to himself in the third person. so be it, it is his right.
However everybody else has the right to ignore him and this SHOULD be done now.
I IMPLORE you all to not enter into debate with this person. he appears to be intent on damaging the study of the Whitechapel murders and this site in particular.
if however he does come up with a name and a theory then all of the rest of us are wrong, so be it.Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
Comment
Comment