Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Team Jack

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Jon. Thanks.

    Know? I consider it much more likely. And that based on Chapman whom we are confident was strangled. (Notice both their tongues.)

    So the hand is more likely than the fist--hence the disjunction.

    Cheers.
    LC
    The fingernail scratches seal it for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    strangled

    Hello Jon. Thanks.

    Know? I consider it much more likely. And that based on Chapman whom we are confident was strangled. (Notice both their tongues.)

    So the hand is more likely than the fist--hence the disjunction.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Jon. Thanks.

    Polly's bruises were described as possibly by a blow to the head. ("Ultimate" p. 35.) Also could have been caused by hand used to stifle/strangle.

    Annie also had peri-mortem bruising.

    Cheers.
    LC

    True, Lynn, but we both know they were caused by a hand over the mouth or chin.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    bruising

    Hello Jon. Thanks.

    Polly's bruises were described as possibly by a blow to the head. ("Ultimate" p. 35.) Also could have been caused by hand used to stifle/strangle.

    Annie also had peri-mortem bruising.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Hi Lynn

    Polly and Annie had blows to the head?
    They had scratch marks and bruises made by fingers but ...

    But yes, Eddowes didn`t have any marks of a blow to the head. She had an abrasion on her left cheek where her head was held down when herthroat was cut, like Chapman and Nichols

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    blow

    Hello DLDW.

    "Blow to head was only for Eddowes." Eddowes? Are you sure about that? Looks like Polly and perhaps Annie.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    will

    Hello Damaso. Well, so much for your inheritance. (heh-heh)

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Hi Errata

    Originally posted by Errata View Post
    They weren't hit in the head.
    Tabram and Coles both had bangs on the head.

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    Hullo!!

    [QUOTE=Errata;267638]It was the first thing I looked into. Their skulls were intact, there was no damage to the brain, and there was no damage to the scalp. No bruises, no scrapes, no pulpy spots. They weren't hit in the head. Nor were they drugged, nor was chloroform used.

    Blow to head was only for Eddowes. Her face. Looks hella swoll. Unsure if knife wounds would cause such swelling. My inability to clearly articulate my point is intirely my fault.

    These women didn't just not scream. They didn't fight at all. Nothing on their hands or shoes indicating they clawed at the ground at all, or tried to push someone off of them. Chapman was killed right next to a fence, and she didn't kick at it or bang against it. They didn't claw the guy on the arms or the face, they didn't get some of his clothes, they didn't even stir up the ground they were lying on. Zero signs of a struggle. And speaking from experience, it doesn't matter how tired you are, how sick you are, when your air supply is cut off you fight like hell. A significant amount of morphine in this country does not go to people who need it for pain, it goes to people on respirators, or being weaned off of respirators to prevent them from experiencing air hunger. It's why waterboarding is torture. And fighting, even silent and ineffective fighting, leaves some sign. And Nichols maybe bit her tongue. That's it.

    Firstly you are dealing in absolutes. Which is usually folly. It's that thing from horror movies that people find stupid. "Why are you just standing there? Do something!" But people are frozen with fear sometimes, or surprised. Which can turn into shock. Which can paralize. Staring into certain unescapable death can render one into stone. And an unsuspecting individual can be subdued quite quickly and effectively/efficiently.

    There's two reasons attacked women don't fight. They think they might survive if they don't fight, or they physically can't. A single man cannot subdue an entire woman without a gun or drugs. He certainly can't do it and kill her at the same time. Try it sometime. Find a willing friend and see what you would have to do in order to hold them completely still while killing them. And without getting incapacitated by a knee to the groin. Did they have cups back then?

    Only two? Come on. A man cannot subdue a woman? Uh, really you're joking. I could subdue a woman of Eddowes height and weight if I was geared up, if she was the right woman, quickly. With little struggle at all. A battle of wills can last only a second and then it doesn't matter after that. And there is no trying it. If you want to recreate it you have to do it. Attacking someone who knows is not the same. Especially if there is no murderous intent. Let alone follow though. Inexact parrallels. You tend to over-personalise. The only thing that is accurate enough to apply, is the desire to murder. And that is not exactly exact. Sorry, pretty drunk. There is NO vehemence directed at you whatsoever. I have very much respect for you. Wow, I'm on one. Stopping, many apologies if I offended at all. It is not my intent. Intent has much to do with "JTR". As far as I can tell. Which is always very far. My horn has been tooted by myself. Lucky I've had much practice.

    Leave a comment:


  • Errata
    replied
    Originally posted by Digalittledeeperwatson View Post
    Nichols was probably drunk and tired. Speed and power to strangle. Prob could've over-powered her without much trouble. I was watching an interview of Mike Tyson talking about how to knock opponents out. He said it wasn't hitting them hard that did it so much as getting them focused else where so they didn't see it coming so the brain can't brace for it. Chapman was ill injured and tired. Not much resistance there either I bet. Eddowes may have been grabbed from behind and taken to the ground, throat slit and held in place until she was no longer capable of anything. Although her face looks swollen which could indicate she was struck first. I am not sure how much swelling would've occured since she died shortly after and was drained of blood. Plus the facial mutilations. Need someone with more knowledge to verify of refute the possibility of that. My personal experience with head trauma is a large blow to the head doesn't result in much initial noise.
    It was the first thing I looked into. Their skulls were intact, there was no damage to the brain, and there was no damage to the scalp. No bruises, no scrapes, no pulpy spots. They weren't hit in the head. Nor were they drugged, nor was chloroform used.

    These women didn't just not scream. They didn't fight at all. Nothing on their hands or shoes indicating they clawed at the ground at all, or tried to push someone off of them. Chapman was killed right next to a fence, and she didn't kick at it or bang against it. They didn't claw the guy on the arms or the face, they didn't get some of his clothes, they didn't even stir up the ground they were lying on. Zero signs of a struggle. And speaking from experience, it doesn't matter how tired you are, how sick you are, when your air supply is cut off you fight like hell. A significant amount of morphine in this country does not go to people who need it for pain, it goes to people on respirators, or being weaned off of respirators to prevent them from experiencing air hunger. It's why waterboarding is torture. And fighting, even silent and ineffective fighting, leaves some sign. And Nichols maybe bit her tongue. That's it.

    There's two reasons attacked women don't fight. They think they might survive if they don't fight, or they physically can't. A single man cannot subdue an entire woman without a gun or drugs. He certainly can't do it and kill her at the same time. Try it sometime. Find a willing friend and see what you would have to do in order to hold them completely still while killing them. And without getting incapacitated by a knee to the groin. Did they have cups back then?

    Leave a comment:


  • Damaso Marte
    replied
    Before Lynn Cates adopts me, I should point out that I think the C5 were all done by the same hand and there was no "Team Jack" - for many of the reasons people have stated in this thread (though, if you tell me that Israel Schwartz is telling the truth, I will drop Stride). I'm just good at understanding and explaining the views of others, even when I do not share those views, be it Lynn, or Team Jack supporters, or Lechmere supporters.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Pass the clapshot.

    Hello Dave. Thanks.

    Well, I suppose I COULD be induced to be fickle. (heh-heh)

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    I prefer my haggis darker and bloodier than that...

    (And stuffed heart is something I'm very fond of too)

    I do most sincerely hope you're not going to fall for me too Lynn!

    All the best

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    brogue

    Hello Simon. Thanks.

    I'd like that. Hope your brogue is good.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Lynn,

    Once I know you better I'll recite the completely and utterly disgusting Robert Burns poem I learned by heart as a wee lad especially for the occasion of the Glorious 25th.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X