Team Jack

[Lechmere]

And to bring in a boring dose of reality nearly all serial crime has a one perpetrator.

[lynn cates]

super villain

Hello Errata. Good question.

"Is there some piece of evidence out there that says that we are definitely looking at a single perpetrator?"

Only natural human desire for a super villain.

Cheers.
LC

[Simon Wood]

Hi Errata,

"Is there some piece of evidence out there that says that we are definitely looking at a single perpetrator?"

No.

Regards,

Simon

[Wickerman]

All the evidence pertaining directly to the killer, whether a Devilish Deviant, or a Dastardly Duo, is ambiguous.

But, the more killers we have, the more places to hide, the more people to avoid, the more lips to talk, the more mistakes to occur, in fact all the concerns are multiplied.
We find no evidence of one killer, let alone two, three, or five.

Are all these killers really so clever and inconspicuous, that no-one around them suspected anything?

[Errata]

I posted something on another thread about how I don't believe that the killer was actually a pair of killers, even though that would answer a lot of questions. But I've been thinking about it, and the more I think about the more problems I have discounting the idea. Basically, I can't think of a reason why I should discount the theory. Despite the fact that I do. Is there some piece of evidence out there that says that we are definitely looking at a single perpetrator?