So where did the idea he looked like a sailor come from?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
BSM & Sailor Man : one and the same ?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ben View PostThanks for the clarification, Jon.
As for Swanson's source for the "sailor" detail, I think the obvious and only answer is Lawende himself.
Best regards,
BenRegards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Hi Jon,
There is simply no way Swanson would have included the "sailor-like" detail in his official police report unless Lawende himself relayed that detail, nor would the police sanctioned Police Gazette have mentioned it. It originated unquestionably with Lawende.
Cheers,
Ben
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ben View PostHi Jon,
There is simply no way Swanson would have included the "sailor-like" detail in his official police report unless Lawende himself relayed that detail, nor would the police sanctioned Police Gazette have mentioned it. It originated unquestionably with Lawende.
Cheers,
Ben
It would appear that no witness in the Stride case (Marshall, Brown, Smith, Schwartz) identified a suspect as looking like a sailor.
And the Mitre Sq. suspect description (Lawende/Harris?) seemingly sourced through the City Police also makes no mention like "appearance of a sailor", then it is a legitimate question to ask what is the source for Swanson's release?
The premise of this thread hangs on the words of Swanson, but no corroboration exists for the 19th Oct. release of a suspect looking like a sailor.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Except that Lawnde was brought in to took at sailor suspects, the first of whom does not resemble the man he descibed -- and thr witness did not affirm -- but was a genuine seaman.
The second man, Grant, resembled the man he saw so much that [presumably] Lawende said yes.
It's a remarkable moment, if it happened.
A Jewish witness from Mitre Sq. affirmed to a sailor who was found almost murdering a Whitechapel prostitute with a knife.
And ... nothing happened. Nor is there the sense of acute disappointment as there was with Sadler.
Quite the opposite.
Within the same period, early 1895, Swanson apparently said the Ripper was a man who was believed to be deceased and Anderson was saying it was a safely caged lunatic (and according to his son believed that this Jewish madman was deceased).
Comment
-
I think some people are barking up the wrong tree.
Either Knifeman was the fiend -- eg. he had a knife -- or Schwartz did not see Jack at all and had the time wrong.
Most importantly, the poice zeroed in on Lawende because the timeline was so tight, and he had described a man as sailor-like in attire.
Grant had scars and tattoos, the man Lawende originally described did not.
Yet they may have been looalikes.
But then this is a case where everybody is weirdly shadowed by a double, or a double who is not:
Druitt and the Drowned Doctor;
Aaron Kosminski and 'Kosminski', and David Cohen;
Colicott and Cutbush, and Cutnush and the cop Cutbush;
Tumblety and the American specimen collector and Littlechild's Dr T who may have taken his own life;
Sadler and Lawende and Sadler and Grant, and Grant and Lawende;
the official version of the Mac Report and it's non-identical twin the 'Aberconway' version, which itself is a copy of a document long lost;
and of course Sims claiming to be the fiend's double.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jonathan H View PostExcept that Lawnde was brought in to took at sailor suspects, the first of whom does not resemble the man he descibed -- and thr witness did not affirm -- but was a genuine seaman.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Hi Jon,
I'm really not sure what you mean when you say that no "corroboration" exists for Lawende having described a man with a sailor-like appearance. If the detail appeared in both a police report and a police-press release (Police Gazette), what more corroboration do we need? There is absolutely no way that a sailor-like appearance would find its way into a police report (City or Met, it matters not) unless the witness in question had relayed as much to the police. And it was Lawende, incidentally. Harris made it quite clear that he got no description of the man.
All the best,
Ben
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ben View PostHi Jon,
I'm really not sure what you mean when you say that no "corroboration" exists for Lawende having described a man with a sailor-like appearance. If the detail appeared in both a police report and a police-press release (Police Gazette), what more corroboration do we need? There is absolutely no way that a sailor-like appearance would find its way into a police report (City or Met, it matters not) unless the witness in question had relayed as much to the police. And it was Lawende, incidentally. Harris made it quite clear that he got no description of the man.
All the best,
BenRegards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ben View PostYes, there is more than enough similarity between BS and "sailor man" to infer than the two may have been the same man. The height, age, headgear, "jacket" are perfectly compatible. Schwartz appeared to have paid more attention to features, whereas Lawende focussed more specifically on clothing. A "sailor-like" peaked cap would be more noteworthy in the City as opposed to Berner Street near the docklands, where sailor-like men were two-a-penny
Ben
Comment
-
5'3" to 5'11"...
Remind me. Which witness alluded to a staggering lunatic?
Oh, come now. Do play along. This is ripperology.
well with others”….
Hyperbole aside-absolutely. Pretty much anyone can go from being violently angry to calm in a matter of minutes let alone 45 minutes. And psychopath serial killers? Probably could do it in seconds. They are chameleons by nature.
Also y'all, remember that Levy said the dude stand about 3 inches higher
that the woman, even though of course he didn't see him...!
Greg
Comment
Comment