Yeah,but no,but......
This Lauren,yeah..she's totally ok....cause she's asked us a question,like
because she wants to know who this Jack The Ripper was..and like we don't know,so she'll have to take a chill pill,yeah??
Bob..........it's at this point that you really appreciate the "Queen's English".
Hi Lauren
We're just having a bit of fun..we're historians.No offence meant.
Getting back to your question..
Unless someone finds something stored or hidden away since the 1800's that gives us a clue or has some new information,there's little chance of any solid new evidence on the case.Because we are discussing this on boards every day,and it's obvious that we know a lot about Jack the Ripper,it doesn't mean that we know who the murderer was,and have decided not to tell anyone else.
This Lauren,yeah..she's totally ok....cause she's asked us a question,like
because she wants to know who this Jack The Ripper was..and like we don't know,so she'll have to take a chill pill,yeah??
Bob..........it's at this point that you really appreciate the "Queen's English".
Hi Lauren

Getting back to your question..
Unless someone finds something stored or hidden away since the 1800's that gives us a clue or has some new information,there's little chance of any solid new evidence on the case.Because we are discussing this on boards every day,and it's obvious that we know a lot about Jack the Ripper,it doesn't mean that we know who the murderer was,and have decided not to tell anyone else.
Comment