Yeah,but no,but......
This Lauren,yeah..she's totally ok....cause she's asked us a question,like
because she wants to know who this Jack The Ripper was..and like we don't know,so she'll have to take a chill pill,yeah??
Bob..........it's at this point that you really appreciate the "Queen's English".
Hi Lauren We're just having a bit of fun..we're historians.No offence meant.
Getting back to your question..
Unless someone finds something stored or hidden away since the 1800's that gives us a clue or has some new information,there's little chance of any solid new evidence on the case.Because we are discussing this on boards every day,and it's obvious that we know a lot about Jack the Ripper,it doesn't mean that we know who the murderer was,and have decided not to tell anyone else.
This Lauren,yeah..she's totally ok....cause she's asked us a question,like
because she wants to know who this Jack The Ripper was..and like we don't know,so she'll have to take a chill pill,yeah??
Bob..........it's at this point that you really appreciate the "Queen's English".
Hi Lauren We're just having a bit of fun..we're historians.No offence meant.
Getting back to your question..
Unless someone finds something stored or hidden away since the 1800's that gives us a clue or has some new information,there's little chance of any solid new evidence on the case.Because we are discussing this on boards every day,and it's obvious that we know a lot about Jack the Ripper,it doesn't mean that we know who the murderer was,and have decided not to tell anyone else.
Comment