If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You considered Carl Feigenbaum a suspect: a man who cannot be definitively placed in Whitechapel during the murders and whose only known murder bore no post-mortem mutilations.
Thank you for putting me right I am sure the world of ripperology will be eternally grateful for your informative input.
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your message. I wasn't aware of your book - which I've just bought and looking forward to read.
I started the Ripper Facts OP as I was keen to try and determine what are the aspects that are ore factual rather than speculative.
I certainly learnt a lot.
I think the decision about what he looked like is important (there are a few credible witnesses who saw a man with the victims just 15 minutes before they were found) as is whether he had surgical skills (the previous discussion by Prosector I found compelling).
From that, I'm testing the above hypothesis.
It may all be a waste of time if the assumptions are wrong; but I think it's important to try to narrow he focus.
Craig
The term suspect should be used lightly in Ripperolgy but it is not, many are nothing more than persons of interest.]
Practice what you preach.
You considered Carl Feigenbaum a suspect: a man who cannot be definitively placed in Whitechapel during the murders and whose only known murder bore no post-mortem mutilations.
I looked at 333 suspects in my book and Christopher Morley took it to 365. Many, like Moloney, are interesting characters and worthy of research in their own right. Few have any plausible connection to Jack the Ripper.
Looking for surgeons is a better method than picking a random celebrity or a witness to an event but is based on the assumption that the killer had surgical knowledge. Several researchers have challenged that assumption and it can't be considered a fact.
Ancestry will have details of Moloney's military and medical records. You may also be able to find references to him in contemporary newspapers.
Best wishes,
Paul
Keep your options open, because the killer might not have had surgical knowledge, in which case you are going down a path with blinkers on, a path, which might lead to nowhere, and take up a lot of your valuable time.
When carrying out an investigation you need to remember these two words "prove" or "disprove" and forget the words "readily accept without question"
You mention 365 suspects from the book, well, they cant all have been the killer could they?
And as to suspects a greater portion should not even be listed as there is nothing more than someones wild speculative theory, which has made the list grow over the years.
The term suspect should be used lightly in Ripperolgy but it is not, many are nothing more than persons of interest.
I looked at 333 suspects in my book and Christopher Morley took it to 365. Many, like Moloney, are interesting characters and worthy of research in their own right. Few have any plausible connection to Jack the Ripper.
Looking for surgeons is a better method than picking a random celebrity or a witness to an event but is based on the assumption that the killer had surgical knowledge. Several researchers have challenged that assumption and it can't be considered a fact.
Ancestry will have details of Moloney's military and medical records. You may also be able to find references to him in contemporary newspapers.
I’ve been researching surgeons who lived or worked around Whitechapel who fit a particular profile :- British, 25 – 35 yo, lived on own, not married, had an event that may have been the catalyst for the murders, had a personality profile that could have been conducive to killing, and had a reason for the murders to stop suddenly.
I’ve found someone who could be interesting to explore further. I’m not saying he was Jack, but I think this is the sort of person who could have been JtR.
At the time, he was only second to Stanley for knowing the most about Africa. He was the medical officer on the famous expedition to Katanga in the Congo in 1891 to claim the territory of some hostile African tribes. The expedition encountered major problems due to illness, lack of food and death; and Moloney had to take command and completed a successful mission. Moloney was the “backbone of the expedition”, made successful treaties with hostile tribal leaders and led his men back to safety.
Upon returning to London, be wrote a fascinating book “With Captain Stairs to Katanga: Slavery and Subjugation in the Congo” which provided a captivating story of the expedition.
He died in 1896 from illness related to his travels.
Moloney fits the profile in several ways :
Age :- bn 1857, so 31 y.o.
Description & personality : “thick set, determined looking, as hard as nails”, An accomplished sportsman, yachtsman, and a good shot; Practiced in South London, held in high esteem esp. by the poor.
Attitudes : The introduction to the modern edition of Moloney’s book says “Like other Victorian writers from the imperial milieu, Moloney is an uneasy guide for a modern reader. Hostile towards black people, Jews and German; and demonstrating a patronising tolerance of the French. Moloney’s habitual use of the word “******” was berated by no less a critic than Henry Morton Stanley who described it as ‘ugly and derisive’”
Qualification: studied medicine at St Thomas’s Hospital, and obtained his degree in Dublin
Allegedly was the medical officer in the First Boer War (Dec 188 – Mar 1881)
Served in the Corps of Royal Naval Artillery Volunteers (?? When ??)
Lived in London city around 1888 but his practice was in Battersea :- (?? Anyway to find where he lived ??)
Father - Jeremiah – was a former captain in the Kings Royal Rifles and died in August 1888 (a possible trauma which provoked attacks ??)
He travelled to Morrocco in 1890 – 91.
He had an interesting larger than life story. Again, I’m not saying he was the Ripper, but I think this is the profile of the type of person who was.
I think the German influence might be present, and someone who makes knifes and blades to a later generation person who uses knives and blades in their occupation sort of fits here.. maybe.
I've sometimes mused that the German words for knife and butcher, Messer and Metzger, might long ago have shared a common ancestor, but that's apparently not the case.
I note that there is a town called Eisenschmitt in the Rhineland, but my money's on the name being patronymic rather than toponymic.
I like the metonymic occupational take myself Sam. As I suggested earlier I think the German influence might be present, and someone who makes knifes and blades to a later generation person who uses knives and blades in their occupation sort of fits here.. maybe.
Leave a comment: