Druitt.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Go back over the post herlock you'll see the answer regarding this topic . Your just playing the same game again .

You'll just twist and wriggle and ignore around my responses .

I have gone back…..you haven’t answered the 6 questions. Tell me the number of the post or posts where those specific 6 questions have been individually answered and I’ll give you a fully apology.

[FISHY1118]

A bit of a nitpick but ok.

He received information.

We don’t know the contents or in what form he received it.

Fishy dismisses it out of hand despite not being in possession of that information.

There's more evidence that we know of thats shows its overwhelmingly so that Druitt wasn't the Whitechapel murderer, that exits that he was.

This has been shown time and time again on this thread .

[FISHY1118]

I have gone back…..you haven’t answered the 6 questions. Tell me the number of the post or posts where those specific 6 questions have been individually answered and I’ll give you a fully apology.

When you accused me of inventing and manipulation and in same breath say you don't have a problem with opinions , you can see the problem posters have with you herlock.

Its always the same thing with you , opinions based on evidence that doesn't agree with yours are met with this type of posting, we all have the same evidence to interpret i gave my opinion regarding druitt ,Lechmere, Maybrick based on that evidence, you don't agree on that stiff s ,get over it and move on.

[Herlock Sholmes]

There's more evidence that we know of thats shows its overwhelmingly so that Druitt wasn't the Whitechapel murderer, that exits that he was.

This has been shown time and time again on this thread .

There’s no evidence for that whatsoever.

[Herlock Sholmes]

When you accused me of inventing and manipulation and in same breath say you don't have a problem with opinions , you can see the problem posters have with you herlock.

Its always the same thing with you , opinions based on evidence that doesn't agree with yours are met with this type of posting, we all have the same evidence to interpret i gave my opinion regarding druitt ,Lechmere, Maybrick based on that evidence, you don't agree on that stiff s ,get over it and move on.

Move on, move on, move on.

Where are those replies that you claim to have made Fishy? All that you have to do is to give me the post numbers. What could be simpler?

[FISHY1118]

There’s no evidence for that whatsoever.

There's plenty . Your not thinking of the evidence as in what detective aAbberline describes in his press statement.

Together with what we know about his movements in Dorset . That is a form of evidence.

Where's any evidence that suggest he was ?

[Fiver]

Move on, move on, move on.

Where are those replies that you claim to have made Fishy? All that you have to do is to give me the post numbers. What could be simpler?

Or he could just copy-paste his previous answers. It would take far less time and effort than his repeatedly claiming to have answered the questions.

[FISHY1118]

Move on, move on, move on.

Where are those replies that you claim to have made Fishy? All that you have to do is to give me the post numbers. What could be simpler?

Why? you ignore or dismissed them the first time , go back and see for yourself ill not repeat the same argument simply because you don't understand the topic at hand ,

Remember you did this on previously threads that went on the same way .we all know what happened to them as a result

[GBinOz]

I agree that’s unlikely that we’ll ever get anything like a conclusive answer either way George. Unless someone finds Druitt’s diary of course. My money’s always been on the case remaining unsolved.

I don’t fancy England’s chances to be honest George. I agree with Boycott in that England appear to be focused on entertaining whilst the Aussies are focused on winning (and if winning is doubtful they focus on not losing - which is something England don’t do) The weather is certainly dodgy and might be a factor though a draw is no good to England of course. I was thinking of starting a cricket thread in Pub Talk btw.

Oh no.....not another diary.

Congratulations on a fine win. I was expecting you to start an Ashes thread before #1.

Cheers, George

[Herlock Sholmes]

There's plenty . Your not thinking of the evidence as in what detective aAbberline describes in his press statement.

Together with what we know about his movements in Dorset . That is a form of evidence.

Where's any evidence that suggest he was ?

The opinion of Abberline is worth noting but nothing more. If you take one persons opinion over another then do you accept Anderson and Swanson and favour Kosminski as the killer? One persons opinion is not evidence and it’s an inescapable fact that by the time that Macnaghten had written his memorandum Abberline was no longer in the job.

From Dorset we know that Druitt was there the day before the murder and there later in the day of the murder. That’s all that we know. Anything more is speculation.

Where is the evidence that Sickert was in London at the time of a murder at the time of his trip to France? Or do these questions only apply to Druitt? If you think that Sickert could have returned from France why do you think it so unlikely that Druitt returned from Dorset? The double-standard is glaring.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Why? you ignore or dismissed them the first time , go back and see for yourself ill not repeat the same argument simply because you don't understand the topic at hand ,

Remember you did this on previously threads that went on the same way .we all know what happened to them as a result

Same on the other thread. You made the same false claim.

There’s a simply way of proving that you’re telling the truth as Fiver says….just give me the post numbers where you have answered my 6 questions. Until such time that you do it will be assumed by all that you are not telling the truth on this issue. Nothing could be simpler or more reasonable.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Oh no.....not another diary.

Congratulations on a fine win. I was expecting you to start an Ashes thread before #1.

Cheers, George

A diary might prove a welcome distraction to be honest. I might start writing one tonight. I’ll check with Ike about where Mike Barrett got that Victorian Diary from.

Thanks George. We’ve kept the series alive at least.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Or he could just copy-paste his previous answers. It would take far less time and effort than his repeatedly claiming to have answered the questions.

Difficult stuff obviously Fiver.

[Herlock Sholmes]

On the subject of Druitt’s father’s will. Monty was advanced £500 for his legal training, apparently on the understanding that it was his share of the will. David Anderson said that he got nothing more from his fathers will which totalled around £16.5k (just under £2 million in todays money) and went to his wife, his eldest son William and Monty’s three sisters. I thought that I’d read somewhere that his sisters received over £1k each but maybe I’m remembering that wrong and I only have access to two ebooks at the moment. Wiki cites Leighton as saying that he received ‘little or nothing.’

Maybe I’m wrong but it looks on the surface as if Monty got a fairly rough deal here? Especially at a time when women usually drew the short straw financially. Might this suggest some kind of rift between Monty and his father? Might his father have been disappointed in his choice of Law over Medicine? I’m not suggesting this is an important point or that we can make any deductions from it (sinister or otherwise) but it just seems a little odd to me.

[FISHY1118]

Move on, move on, move on.

Where are those replies that you claim to have made Fishy? All that you have to do is to give me the post numbers. What could be simpler?

Move on ? your kidding right , ''manipulating and inventing'' your words herlock .