Originally posted by FISHY1118
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Druitt.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
I didn’t say that you said it. Your repeated comments show it to have been the case.
That a false statement . You should apologize.'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
And his opinion the evidence that he saw. You are dismissing evidence that we have never seen to be able to assess.
So you’re assuming that the evidence wasn’t worthy of interest…..when you don’t know what that evidence was. Exactly as I’ve been saying all along, to a chorus of complaining.
Very fair-minded.
Produce it and I'll comment on it .'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
I can't comment on evidence that doesn't or has never been shown to have existed ,
Produce it and I'll comment on it .Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
You’re even doing it now.
But keep going let's see if this thread will get shot to bits and closed like the others .'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
But you have no problem dismissing it though? How can you dismiss something that you’ve never seen?
Product the evidence and ill comment on it. Simply'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
The same way you can say it exist without anyone ever seeing it or any evidence of it.
Product the evidence and ill comment on it. SimplyRegards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
As you are unable to answer 5 very simple questions I’ll make it easier by giving you just one to avoid.
If you feel that Druitt, Lechmere and Maybrick should be eliminated from all discussion perhaps you could gives us the evidence that shows us why Sir William Gull shouldn’t be eliminated too?Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
Macnaghten said that he’d seen it. You can deny it’s existence until you’re blue in the face but it won’t matter.
No mention of his seeing any documents or how he came by the private information.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View PostAs you are unable to answer 5 very simple questions I’ll make it easier by giving you just one to avoid.
If you feel that Druitt, Lechmere and Maybrick should be eliminated from all discussion perhaps you could gives us the evidence that shows us why Sir William Gull shouldn’t be eliminated too?
Don't you remember have you forgotten already it wasn't long ago.
Your just inciting arguement for arguement sake, grow up a little.'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
Macnaghten said that he’d seen it. You can deny it’s existence until you’re blue in the face but it won’t matter.'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
Already discussed that herlock when you wouldn't reply to my post or response to it .
Don't you remember have you forgotten already it wasn't long ago.
Your just inciting arguement for arguement sake, grow up a little.
You, on the other hand, have categorically refused to answer 6 very simple questions. Because you can’t and you know it.Last edited by Herlock Sholmes; 07-09-2023, 01:34 PM.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
That's not quite correct what he says is "He was sexually insane and from private information I have little doubt but that his own family believed him to have been the murderer"
No mention of his seeing any documents or how he came by the private information.
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
He received information.
We don’t know the contents or in what form he received it.
Fishy dismisses it out of hand despite not being in possession of that information.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
I’ve responded to every single one of your posts. If I’ve missed one you are free to repeat it and I assure you that I’ll respond. So I’m avoiding nothing.
You, on the other hand, have categorically refused to answer 6 very simple questions. Because you can’t and you know it.
You'll just twist and wriggle and ignore around my responses .'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
Comment