Originally posted by Wickerman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Convince me that it wasn't Barnett
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Filby View Post
Most of the victims of JtR had "falling out" with their male counterparts within a short time prior to their fate.. This led them to the streets and to the drink even more. I would like to read on some debate as to whether this is something worth discussing or all too common?
I think that for most of the Ripper victims, the falling out didn't happen as close to their murders as for Kelly, and usually the falling out resulted from the women's excessive drinking, so there probably wasn't any jealousy involved. The men left the women because they didn't want to continue the relationships. However, I agree with kensei that it seems very unlikely to me that he would have killed Nichols, and same way with Chapman and Eddowes.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kensei View PostI've long been a defender of Barnett. I can't convince anyone that he wasn't the Ripper, but to me he and MJK fit a classic profile of a dysfunctional couple with alcohol heavily involved who didn't actually split up but were "on a break" and needed time apart. He still visited her after moving out, the sure sign of a boyfriend who was hoping to put things back together. I think he was essentially a stupid boy in love with a very flawed woman. Their heated argument that broke the window means nothing- there were probably hundreds of such incidents throughout Whitechapel/Spitalfields on any given night. I can't see any way that his frustrations with Mary make him go out and kill Polly Nicholls. Makes no sense to me at all.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Scott Nelson View PostI think Barnett took his smoking pipe with him when he left the room that night. As I speculate, the pipe referred to in the press was the drainpipe he used to steady his right arm as he reached through the broken glass window with his left hand to unlatch the door. The coroner didn't ask for clarification on this, but he should have.
MJK was killed sleeping on one side of the bed and was posed in the middle after. Why is she on one side of the bed asleep? Someone is sleeping on the other. So apparently, MJK wasn't that afraid of JtR at all, at least not strangers who could be the killer. Then we have the latch trick, which this killer would have witnessed if Barnett was telling the truth about the missing key. It is totally ridiculous. Yet she wasn't afraid of anyone in particular. Prater is the witness who went drinking in the morning and back to bed. Mary did the same and obviously Barnett met up and was in beside her and probably charged with paying the rent if the call came, and he couldn't. End of the line. He is probably JtR. Burned clothes to stay warm in the nude so he could clean up afterward. It is daylight. No need for fires for light, just warmth. Candle would be enough anyway at night. Just accept Maxwell and dismiss the others who see this JtR character as attention seekers. It does add up.
Leave a comment:
-
I think Barnett took his smoking pipe with him when he left the room that night. As I speculate, the pipe referred to in the press was the drainpipe he used to steady his right arm as he reached through the broken glass window with his left hand to unlatch the door. The coroner didn't ask for clarification on this, but he should have.
Leave a comment:
-
I went through some things with AI about this and eventually this is what it had to say:
If it were conclusively proven that Joseph Barnett left his pipe behind at the Mary Jane Kelly crime scene where he sometimes lived with her as her boyfriend, it would be a highly significant and potentially incriminating piece of evidence. Such a discovery could make Barnett a stronger suspect in the Jack the Ripper case, as it would directly link him to the crime scene.
I think the idea behind that is a pipe isn't just something a smoker leaves behind and doesn't miss quite very soon after. What could be his reason for not going back?
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Al.
Originally posted by Al Bundy's Eyes View Post
Well, the debate is about Barnett, so...
Barnett knew the victim.
He had access to the property.
He'd recently ended their relationship and was unhappy with Mary's lifestyle choices.
He was unemployed, so was free to move around the area at any time.
The killer could have been self-employed, a shift worker, or independently wealthy.
He was a local.
Barnett's an unlikely candidate, but he is at least a candidate.
I think you would agree, he is obviously the first person - as the significant other - the police will look at, that's a given even today. And as he told us he was in their custody 2 hours? They looked him over thoroughly, and dismissed him.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post...every press version offers the words: "[COLOR=black]There was a man's clay pipe in the room, and Barnett informed me that he smoked it."
The press were present at the inquest, so it is hard to imagine them all misunderstanding the context?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fanatic View Post
There is stacks of evidence against Maybrick… he is the only one who could be brought to trial realistically…, I won’t clog up this thread but I ask you to PLEASE do some research for yourself
Barnett knew the victim. He had access to the property. He'd recently ended their relationship and was unhappy with Mary's lifestyle choices. He was unemployed, so was free to move around the area at any time. He was a local. There's a few points.
Maybrick was ... Well, without the diary, nothing at all. Every bit of the "stacks" of evidence comes from the diary.
Barnett's an unlikely candidate, but he is at least a candidate.
And yes, I've researched the subject. And read Ike's brilliant societies pillar.
Welcome to the boards.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Scott Nelson View Post
I've argued before that there was no pipe used for smoking found in her room. The verbiage used by Abberline during the inquest -- "I am informed by the witness Barnett that the key has been missing for some time & that they opened the door by reaching through the window, a pipe was there & used by him." -- implies that Barnett used the exterior drainpipe to balance himself as he reached through the broken window to unlatch the door.
In another version of Abberline's statement by a police recorder, the pipe "was there and smoked by him." But this latter version makes no sense in the context of trying to get into the room. The recorder misunderstood the intent of the statement and created a smoking pipe found in the room instead.
I don't recall hearing that before.
It is true, the court record could suggest a drain pipe, it's just that every press version offers the words: "There was a man's clay pipe in the room, and Barnett informed me that he smoked it."
The press were present at the inquest, so it is hard to imagine them all misunderstanding the context?
Interesting.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by c.d. View Post
Except that he knew she was a prostitute. What did he think she was doing with her clients? If he had the mindset you describe why hook up in a romantic relationship in the first place with a prostitute?
c.d.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Macdonald Triad View PostIf Barnett was MK's killer it would be easy to see how. Imagine walking down the street and a couple of blokes look at you and snicker about just rogering your missus' backside. He would have to have been the biggest cuckold in the history of the world. The other women killed were probably bad influences on Mary and if Barnett was the killer, he was probably trying to scare her straight in his own demented way. That last part is not my idea, I picked it up somewhere, but the humiliation part I've never heard addressed. How could any man tolerate that?
c.d.
Leave a comment:
-
It should be noted that the DC Snipers (the older one) was sniping all those people to cover up a hit on his ex-wife. It's not such a fantastical proposition.
Leave a comment:
-
If Barnett was MK's killer it would be easy to see how. Imagine walking down the street and a couple of blokes look at you and snicker about just rogering your missus' backside. He would have to have been the biggest cuckold in the history of the world. The other women killed were probably bad influences on Mary and if Barnett was the killer, he was probably trying to scare her straight in his own demented way. That last part is not my idea, I picked it up somewhere, but the humiliation part I've never heard addressed. How could any man tolerate that?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: