Why can’t the couple be Spooner and his lady friend? They were around. They had returned from a pub in Commercial Road so why couldn’t they have walked down Berner Street and gone left into Fairclough? Might they have stopped on the corner for a short time to be seen by Brown? Is it impossible that after Spooner went to the yard with Diemschitz his girlfriend decided to walk round there to see what was going on (where she’d spoken to Fanny)?
Suspect Witnesses?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by The Rookie Detective View Post
I find it fascinating how the only time the girl stated she was alone, was when she walked past the yard a few minutes before midnight, and up to meet her young man at the top of the street at the junction with Commercial Road.
The rest of the statement is spoken in the context of them both being together...
...even for the walk back down Berner St.
Literally
And apparently I am the one whose not sticking to the known evidence.
As I said previously, the young woman's "just before" is like Mortimer's "just gone indoors", in regard to timespan - a couple of minutes.
Would be nice if we knew who the couple were. I'll take a punt on the identity of the man.
Charles Letchford, living at 30 Berner street, says:- "I passed through the street at half past 12, and everything seemed to me to be going on as usual, and my sister was standing at the door at ten minutes to one, but did not see anyone pass by. I heard the commotion when the body was found, and heard the policemen's whistles, but did not take any notice of the matter, as disturbances are very frequent at the club, and I thought it was only another row."
This happened to me before when Schwartz stated he got "as far as the gateway" when he witnessed the assault on Stride.
Not from half way up the road
He had to be in visual sight of Stride to see her being assaulted in the first place.
And yet again, apparently I wasn't sticking to the known facts.
Some of us can seemingly alter and manipulate statements to fit things, while others can't.
I think you and I are in the minority on this.
We both know that Schwartz was dodgy for example.
I know we differ on this couple thing, but at least with you there's never any attempt to quash someone else's ideas.
I appreciate every single time you post, as you've always got something constructive to say, whether I agree with it or not.Andrew's the man, who is not blamed for nothing
👍 1Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
Why can’t the couple be Spooner and his lady friend? They were around. They had returned from a pub in Commercial Road so why couldn’t they have walked down Berner Street and gone left into Fairclough? Might they have stopped on the corner for a short time to be seen by Brown? Is it impossible that after Spooner went to the yard with Diemschitz his girlfriend decided to walk round there to see what was going on (where she’d spoken to Fanny)?
Anyone who disagrees with this theory will need to explain what became of the lady friend left alone on Fairclough St.Andrew's the man, who is not blamed for nothing
Comment
-
Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post
I reckon that is exactly what happened to Spooner's lady friend, after Edward left her on the street. Presumably, he ran off with her saying something like "I'll meet you there". For this to work we must suppose Fanny thought that the pub they were outside was the Nelson, when in fact it was the Beehive. Hence her belief that they had been less than 20 yards from the murder.
Anyone who disagrees with this theory will need to explain what became of the lady friend left alone on Fairclough St.Herlock Sholmes
”I don’t know who Jack the Ripper was…and neither do you.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Rookie Detective View Post
How can she say "goodnight" to him, if she's already walked down back down Berner St alone?
Which directly suggests, either her walk down Berner st. was only a few yards, or the couple walked down and back - then said 'goodnight'.
I don't think this is difficult to figure out.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Rookie Detective View PostThey see a man walk along Commercial Road - they must be at the top of the street.
They then walk down Berner St (exactly as she says)
And then they say "Goodnight"
First they walk down Berner St. (and back), so now, back at the top, they can easily see a man walk along Commercial St., then they say 'goodnight', at the same spot where they met.
Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post
I reckon that is exactly what happened to Spooner's lady friend, after Edward left her on the street. Presumably, he ran off with her saying something like "I'll meet you there". For this to work we must suppose Fanny thought that the pub they were outside was the Nelson, when in fact it was the Beehive. Hence her belief that they had been less than 20 yards from the murder.
The Beehive pub is 100 yards from Dutfield Yard.
Anyone who disagrees with this theory will need to explain what became of the lady friend left alone on Fairclough St.
Any one of them could have been Spooner's ladyfriend, Eagle said there were about a half-dozen women at the club that night.
Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
Wrong sequence.
First they walk down Berner St. (and back), so now, back at the top, they can easily see a man walk along Commercial St., then they say 'goodnight', at the same spot where they met.Andrew's the man, who is not blamed for nothing
😂 1Comment
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
Fanny didn't 'think' anything, the young girl spoke to the journalist, she said 'they' (girl + boyfriend) had been standing 'not 50 yds' away. And had been there for 20 minutes, when the alarm was raised.
The Beehive pub is 100 yards from Dutfield Yard.
The young woman is not quoted, suggesting the reporter is getting this information second-hand, as is the case with the "measured, heavy tramp" report that immediately follows. The bisecting thoroughfare is not named, and the not fifty yards reference is ambiguous, suggesting confusion as to which corner the couple had been standing at. Why would the young woman give an estimate that broad, if Fanny could see them from her doorstep?
Yes, the Beehive was 100 yards from the yard, so the second-hand source - probably Fanny - was not a completely reliable one.
No need to explain anything, PC Lamb said when he got there, shortly after Spooner arrived, there were about 30 people in the yard.
Any one of them could have been Spooner's ladyfriend, Eagle said there were about a half-dozen women at the club that night.
FM: A young man and his sweetheart were standing at the corner of the street, about twenty yards away, before and after the time the woman must have been murdered, but they told me they did not hear a sound.
Fanny thought the couple had been standing at the Nelson corner. Had that been the case, they would have been in a position to see:
* Liz Stride at the gateway
* BS Man throwing her to the footway
* Israel Schwartz stopping to watch
* Pipeman lighting his pipe
* Pipeman seemingly pursue Schwartz at running pace
* Fanny Mortimer at her doorstep
* James Brown going to and from the chandler's shop
* Leon Goldstein walking hurriedly down Berner and into Fairclough St with black bag
* Whoever else may have entered the yard to commit the murder
Yet we hear nothing of them from the police, or at the inquest.Andrew's the man, who is not blamed for nothing
Comment
-
Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post
This guy really knew how to impress a girl - walk her virtually to her door, then have her turn around and walk back to the top of the street with him, before saying goodnight to her and letting her walk back home alone. Classy.
So according to Jon...
The girl walks up Berner St from her house (in Berner St) and walks past the yard (meaning she lives SOUTH of the murder site) and then she meets her man at the top of the street at the junction of Commercial Road, before they then take a short walk along Commercial Road, and then they walk back along Commercial Road to get back to the corner of Berner st, but they then walk back down Berner St together...and then turn around and go back up Berners St to the corner of Commercial Road again...at which time they then see the man walking along Commercial Road towards Aldgate...and then they say "goodnight"...and the girl then walks back down Berner Street again, alone...and walks back past the murder site, while her young man walks off from the corner of Commercial Road.
And nobody sees any problem with that?
Hilarious.
Last edited by The Rookie Detective; Yesterday, 11:31 PM."Great minds, don't think alike"
Comment
-
Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post
This guy really knew how to impress a girl - walk her virtually to her door, then have her turn around and walk back to the top of the street with him, before saying goodnight to her and letting her walk back home alone. Classy.
Maybe he is a quick learner ?
(. . "if I catch you anywhere near my daughter again". . .) or words to that effect.
Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Rookie Detective View Post
Exactly
So according to Jon...
The girl walks up Berner St from her house (in Berner St) and walks past the yard (meaning she lives SOUTH of the murder site) and then she meets her man at the top of the street at the junction of Commercial Road,. . .
Our first question should be, what is a nice girl doing out by herself at such a late hour?
As I suggested, maybe she sneaked out when her parents went to bed?
Or, maybe she was a servant girl, who got off at 11:30 pm, and snook out of her room to meet her date?
The very fact she seems to have been out so late by herself suggests this was a meeting that would not be approved of by, either her family or her employer or associates.
Because she did walk up Berner St. by herself, it is quite reasonable to suggest she had to walk back by herself, and for the same reason, whatever that reason was.
Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post
Would be nice if we knew who the couple were. I'll take a punt on the identity of the man.
Charles Letchford, living at 30 Berner street, says:- "I passed through the street at half past 12, and everything seemed to me to be going on as usual, and my sister was standing at the door at ten minutes to one, but did not see anyone pass by. I heard the commotion when the body was found, and heard the policemen's whistles, but did not take any notice of the matter, as disturbances are very frequent at the club, and I thought it was only another row."
Christmas Day weddings were to be a feature for the family over the years and Charles was married on this day in 1889 to Sarah Ann Grant at Christ Church, Spitalfields.
The record gives the following details:
Charles Edward Michael Letchford, 24, Barman, 17 Hanbury St., father Edward Letchford, labourer
Sarah Ann Grant 22, 10 Booth St, father George Grant, bricklayer.Andrew's the man, who is not blamed for nothing
Comment
Comment