Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes
View Post
W. Wess, secretary of the International Club, Berner-street, called at our office at midnight, and stated that, it having come to his knowledge that the man who was seen by Mrs. Mortimer, of 36, Berner-street, passing her house with a black, shiny bag, and walking very fast down the street from the Commercial-road at about the time of the murder, was a member of the club, he persuaded him last night, between ten and eleven o'clock, to accompany him to the Leman-street station, where he made a statement as to his whereabouts on Saturday evening, which was entirely satisfactory. The young man's name is Leon Goldstein, and he is a traveller.
We get his occupation. Why not the same with Schwartz, from either report? The closest we get is the intriguing phrase...
This foreigner was well dressed, and had the appearance of being in the theatrical line.
...which probably has nothing to do with his occupation, anyway. However, how many near destitute men would have had the appearance of being in the theatrical line? More than zero?
Perhaps he did mention details to the Police though that they did check out and proved correct and this is why they continued to consider him a very valid witness all through October and in to November. Something that they would hardly have done if he’d been caught out in a pack of lies. We also have to note that they continued to see him as a very important witness despite Fanny Mortimer (who is being used 130 years later to try and disprove him.) Clearly the Police, there on the scene and after speaking to witnesses face to face and in detail, believed that Fanny Mortimer was indoors when Schwartz passed.
When Abberline interviewed Schwartz, was he aware of people like Mortimer, Brown, Spooner, and others, and their locations at around 12.45?
Leave a comment: