If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why did Macnaghten deny Cutbush as a serious suspect?
I don't think the Sun mentions this police uncle relationship, which one would have expected them to do if it were true.
But wouldn't it have been difficult to do that while preserving the anonymity of the suspect?
Perhaps this was the closest the Sun could come to mentioning the alleged relationship? "Jack the Ripper has relatives; they are some of them in positions which would make them a target for the natural curiosity - for the unreasoning reprobation which would pursue any person even remotely connected with so hideous a monstrosity ..."
Yes Chris, well, it seems to me that there are two possibilities here :
Either the Sun had no evidence of a Thomas/Supt Cutbush link, or it did, but declined to publish it or hint at it. The latter possibility would suggest that the Sun was not in the business of out and out sensationalism - I mean, Jack the Ripper a friend/nephew/what-have-you to a top policeman? What a godsend for a newspaper!
I haven't seen anything in the recent information released from Broadmoor that convinces me that Cutbush might have been the Ripper.
But the Ripper was no foaming at the mouth lunatic - he was able to carry out a series of murders and escape without leaving a clue. Cutbush was a rather obvious head case.
Most likely the records will convince me otherwise. Schizophrenia is no laughing matter. Ive seen it first hand and its not what makes a Ripper.
Im in total agreement that JTR was somewhat more than a lunatic. In fact I believe he was alot more than that. And Cutbush seems like a total red herring.
Comment