Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The could be knife Thomas Coram found on October the 1st 1888

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by niko View Post

    John when I say shock I mean that the person in shock can't move a muscle or even let out a scream ! (paralisied) I've seen this happen on a couple of ocasion's.
    Hi Niko fair enough. I'm still not sure that part of your hypothesis is right.

    Leave a comment:


  • niko
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post

    Thanks for the reply Niko. I agree with you that Jack probably carried more than one knife. However I doubt Jack wanted to cause shock to his victims. This would just increase his chances of being caught. Lastly I find your hypothesis interesting. Cheers John
    John when I say shock I mean that the person in shock can't move a muscle or even let out a scream ! (paralisied) I've seen this happen on a couple of ocasion's.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by niko View Post

    Hello John, possibilites ? found in the area of the crimes 24 hour's after the double event, covered in blood !! but personally I think it was not used in the Whitechapel mureder's, like quoted in the Stride inquest the knife presented at the hearing had a blunted cutting edge, the tip was rounded off !! exactly how I found the knife, a knife in these condition's couldn't even cut up a paper bag !! my hypothesis is that Jack carried more than one knife !! a large knife to itimidate and cause shock to his victim's before cutting their throat's and a smaller knife to do his surgical work, Here we go !! Jack pull's out this big knife out on stride in the Berner ckub, whilst cutting her throat the blade catches Strides scarf, this cauaing to cause his hand to slip onto the blade and cut's himself !! this being the reason to flee the scene of the crime without disembowling Stride. i belive he was not content on not doing his usaul extraction of organ's.

    Once he calmed down after being injured he went to find another victim to do with her what he had in mind to do with his victim of that night and he did he found Eddowes !! the reason he took a piece of Eddowes apron was for his injured hand. Remember the knife Coram found had a hankerchif wrapped around the handle ans was covered in blood. I think in his wierd mind he gained hatered for the knife because it had injured him !! so he dameged the knife by blunting it and breaking the tip thus not having a pointed tip no more and also bent the blade, in Strides inquest to the blade being bent they refer to it us being turned !! Also after the double event there was a size of Jack's activity, was the reason for this his injured hand ?????That's one hypothesis and another is that it belonged to the mason's LOL!!
    Thanks for the reply Niko. I agree with you that Jack probably carried more than one knife. However I doubt Jack wanted to cause shock to his victims. This would just increase his chances of being caught. Lastly I find your hypothesis interesting. Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • niko
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    Niko may well have the knife. But I'm just wondering how likely it is that the knife found by Coram was a knife used by the Ripper?
    Hello John, possibilites ? found in the area of the crimes 24 hour's after the double event, covered in blood !! but personally I think it was not used in the Whitechapel mureder's, like quoted in the Stride inquest the knife presented at the hearing had a blunted cutting edge, the tip was rounded off !! exactly how I found the knife, a knife in these condition's couldn't even cut up a paper bag !! my hypothesis is that Jack carried more than one knife !! a large knife to itimidate and cause shock to his victim's before cutting their throat's and a smaller knife to do his surgical work, Here we go !! Jack pull's out this big knife out on stride in the Berner ckub, whilst cutting her throat the blade catches Strides scarf, this cauaing to cause his hand to slip onto the blade and cut's himself !! this being the reason to flee the scene of the crime without disembowling Stride. i belive he was not content on not doing his usaul extraction of organ's.

    Once he calmed down after being injured he went to find another victim to do with her what he had in mind to do with his victim of that night and he did he found Eddowes !! the reason he took a piece of Eddowes apron was for his injured hand. Remember the knife Coram found had a hankerchif wrapped around the handle ans was covered in blood. I think in his wierd mind he gained hatered for the knife because it had injured him !! so he dameged the knife by blunting it and breaking the tip thus not having a pointed tip no more and also bent the blade, in Strides inquest to the blade being bent they refer to it us being turned !! Also after the double event there was a size of Jack's activity, was the reason for this his injured hand ?????That's one hypothesis and another is that it belonged to the mason's LOL!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Nelson
    replied
    Well, it could have been. Blackwell and Phillips were less than certain that it was not.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Niko may well have the knife. But I'm just wondering how likely it is that the knife found by Coram was a knife used by the Ripper?

    Leave a comment:


  • niko
    replied
    Hello everyone !! long time no see !! hope all are well, no progress unfortunly, Just wanted to bring somthing over!! in Strides inquest a 12 inch knife was produced at the hearing, the image Ive placed is a sketch drawed by the police newspaper reporter, the blade of the knfe in the sketch look's wider than the knife's handle, in the inquest it was refured to as a baker's type of knife. As you can see in the sketch the knife has a pointed shape and not rouned as Iv'e heard that a surgical amputating knife was used in the crimes. i still believe the knife I have was that that Thomas Coram found along the Whitechapel rd on the 1st of October 1888.

    All the best,

    Niko

    Leave a comment:


  • niko
    replied
    Originally posted by wigngown View Post
    Hi Niko,

    I've just picked up on this thread. How is your research progressing, if at all?

    Best regards,
    Hello Wigngown !! sorry for the delay in replying to your question. The latest is that I have passed my phone number and email to a lady that worked at the same school where the teacher that asked me if a pair of sicssors or a knife had been found in the garage that I worked at, This lady will pass on my email to a friend of her's that is in contact with the teacher that asked about the knife.

    In the past I phoned, emailed and even sent a friend of mine who is a priest to the school where the teacher that I am looking for worked as headmistrees and on all the ocasion's the school denied to give me information or contact detail for the mentioned teacher. My personal opinion is that the school contacted the teacher telling her that I was inquireing about her !! If this is true then she know's Im wanting to contact her but she is avoiding me !! I think this teacher know's somthing wich is related to the knife that I have in my posession.

    All the best,

    Niko

    Leave a comment:


  • wigngown
    replied
    Hi Niko,

    I've just picked up on this thread. How is your research progressing, if at all?

    Best regards,

    Leave a comment:


  • niko
    replied
    Originally posted by niko View Post
    Here are two photograph's taken the same month that I found the knife, I obtained the photo's from Bancroft road libary. I think they are originally from the Daily Mirror.If you look near the white lorry there is a bloke holding a broom in the middle of the street!! that's me infront of the garage.

    I can remember it as if it was yesterday, there was little work in the garage and I was sweeping the garage entrance, on the other side of the road the was a woman, we looked at each other and said hello, she asked me for a cigarette, which I kindly gave her. I could see she had a camera in her hand, I told her it was a bad day for photos dueing it was a very dull day, she said she had to take a photgraph for the newspaper, then she asked me if I minded standing in the middle of the street whilst she took the photograph as the were little comuter's in the street, I agreed and asked in which newspaper would the articule be in ? she said tomorow,I can't remember if it was the Sun or the Daily Mail, I think it was the Daily Mirror it started to rain and she went done the street, once near the Brit she took the picture, we then waved goodbye.

    If you look behind me theres a lorry that can't get pass, because of the van parked on the right, the bloke in the van is blowing his horn with a right bad temper !! and the van driver was in the bog !! lol.

    This was around 1983, there was a dustman's strike in London and there was rubbish and rat's everyehere !! I think the army was called in to collect the rubbish, any way !! the next day I gets the newspaper and there I am on the front page !! the title read "the dirtiest street in London" I supose it was a bit dirty due to the strike but by far the dirtiest !! one of my nieghbour's threw a wobbler and she wrote a letter to the newspaper,lol they were great day's in the East End !!

    Iv'e tried to find the newspaper article and photograph but I find it impossible !! in the other photograph is Charlies Taxi Garage and a friend's grandmother with her little sister, I really respected this woman, my friend's grandmother, she gave me plenty of advice on life !! saw her once on tv, the BBC done an interview on her, great lady !! I send you my love to where ever you are xx

    All the best,

    Niko
    Here's the photograph's
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • niko
    replied
    Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
    Hi Niko,

    This incident (assuming it wasn't a figment of the victim's imagination) took place much closer to your railway arch.

    Gary


    http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=1463
    Hello Gary, your right it's much nearer to the arch than Pinchin street Sutton street, turn into Martha street, cross Watney street and into Chapman street which run's parrarell to Cornwall street on the other side of the arches.

    All the best,

    Niko

    Leave a comment:


  • MrBarnett
    replied
    Hi Niko,

    This incident (assuming it wasn't a figment of the victim's imagination) took place much closer to your railway arch.

    Gary


    Discussion of other criminal cases that have some relation to the Ripper, including various East End murders, other serial killers (both modern and historical), etc.
    Last edited by MrBarnett; 02-27-2016, 05:44 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • niko
    replied
    double fudge !!

    Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
    I'm on the edge of my seat.

    Was the place anywhere near Cornwall Street?
    Yes mrbarnett , sorry folk's it won't let me up load the images. last try !!

    Leave a comment:


  • niko
    replied
    Fudge.

    Having problems

    Leave a comment:


  • MrBarnett
    replied
    Originally posted by niko View Post
    Got carried away and forgot to post the photograph's, lol, sorry.
    I'm on the edge of my seat.

    Was the place anywhere near Cornwall Street?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X