If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Simon,
You sound as though you have "private information" ! Are you saying they knew who the Ripper was? I dont believe they had any idea but maybe you know something we dont?
Best
Norma
I wouldn't go so far as to say I have 'private information' for that would make it sound like something it isn't. All I can say is that I am attempting to get to the bottom of 'certain information' which has been brought to my attention that suggests the Whitechapel murders were more involved and far-reaching than any of us imagine. I don't yet understand the full strength of it, but let me just say that this whole affair has been kept a closely-guarded secret for well over 100 years, which would not be the case if the answer was as simple as someone like Druitt or Kosminski having been "Jack the Ripper".
Regards,
Simon
Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.
I'm intrigued too. But please forgive me if I take some time to firm-up matters before saying anything, for in the end it may be something or may prove to be nothing and I have no wish to look a fool. Also, dribbling out information piecemeal does tend to make some people torpedo you before your bows have even hit the water. We all know how that goes.
So with fingers crossed, like Zorro I shall return.
Regards,
Simon
Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.
Last nights Question time panel at the WS, lambasted Sir Robert Anderson as a liar, inept, morally bankrupt and involved in conspiracy?
Does anyone else actually believe this fiction or are you all as devoid from reality as it would appear when it comes to Sir Robert? I mean are we looking for FACT or are we in search of some bizarre glamorized fiction?
Comment