Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anderson in NY Times, March 20, 1910

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • perrymason
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Natalie Severn View Post
    Thankyou Mike----you are not so bad yourself you know!
    Yeah......I know.

    Cheers sweetie

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Originally posted by perrymason View Post
    Quite the contrary my lady...as you saw. And I count you among that enviable group Nats.

    My best as always

    Thankyou Mike----you are not so bad yourself you know!

    Leave a comment:


  • perrymason
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Natalie Severn View Post
    I bet Mike"s squirming a bit after that reposte Ap
    Quite the contrary my lady...as you saw. And I count you among that enviable group Nats.

    My best as always

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Originally posted by Cap'n Jack View Post
    And you have my full and formidable support, Michael, for such a noble resolution.

    I bet Mike"s squirming a bit after that reposte Ap

    Leave a comment:


  • perrymason
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Cap'n Jack View Post
    And you have my full and formidable support, Michael, for such a noble resolution.
    I know who I can count on to stand tall AP....and you and Simon are at the top of that list.

    My respect and thanks mate

    Leave a comment:


  • Cap'n Jack
    replied
    And you have my full and formidable support, Michael, for such a noble resolution.

    Leave a comment:


  • perrymason
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Nicely put, Michael. I wasn't going to be quite so gracious.
    In case youve missed it, Ive made a New Years resolution in this area.....spurious counter arguments and off handed dismissals will be met head on.....and not always in such a nice way.

    Its time to stop being impeded making any progress due to nonsensical arguments and whimsical dismissals of potentially vital information.

    I think that will help people like us, and Phil, and Lynn, and others who think that correct answers are far more relevant than failed hypothesis and unfounded beliefs.

    My best regards mate

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Nicely put, Michael. I wasn't going to be quite so gracious.

    Leave a comment:


  • perrymason
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by jason_c View Post
    Will a few posters on this thread get yourselves a room.
    Youre just witnessing the wheat being separated from the chaff.....not any conspiracy

    Best regards

    Leave a comment:


  • jason_c
    replied
    Will a few posters on this thread get yourselves a room.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Simon,

    Or post-robberyism?

    best wishes

    Phil

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Scott,

    If you're up a blind alley [the current location of Ripperology] the only thing to do is turn around, go back to where the alley began and take another direction, so I prefer to think of it as post-rationalism.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • perrymason
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Scott Nelson View Post
    My, isn't post-modernism getting infectious around here?
    Hi Scott,

    Post modernsim? Wouldnt revisionist theory suggest that there was indeed a sound existing explanation of events already in place?

    I wonder if you then have some explanation why senior investigators named different officials as being responsible for the foiling of the Balfour Plot in France and scaring off General Millen, a double agent, and also following Roger McKenna, a Fenian operative...Anderson says it was Williamson who was sent there, Monro says it was Inspector Melville, and that Williamson was the following year.

    As Simon has demonstrated, we know Anderson who left for "rest" in Switzerland was summoned back from Paris.

    Best regards
    Last edited by Guest; 01-04-2010, 07:04 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Nelson
    replied
    My, isn't post-modernism getting infectious around here?

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi All,

    Let's not forget that Anderson was on the continent "for his health" and not in any official capacity.

    And if we believe that, we seriously need a reality check.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X