Originally posted by Simon Wood
View Post
Anderson in NY Times, March 20, 1910
Collapse
X
-
Hi AP,
I enjoyed your equine analogy. To my eye the dried turd is the much too late and oh so convenient Swanson Marginalia. Take it away and all you're left with is Macnaghten putting two bob on Druitt in an each-way bet with Kosminski and Ostrog, and SRA fingering a Polish Jew picked at random from Macnaghten's memorandum.
Strange that neither of them picked Ostrog, the only one with an alibi.
Regards,
Simon
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View PostHey, I got my horse in that race now.
And shies to the left when it comes upon the dead body of AP's theory.
Let's all vote Ostrog and rock the establishment.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Don't talk bollocks
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cap'n JackBut it all sort of comes down to the documents that have been produced to emphasis the case for Kosminski and Tumblety, doesn't it?
Originally posted by Cap'n JackNormally the horse bolts before the stable door is closed, but in these curious cases we have the horse stabled and the door bolted, and then the blasted creation walks through the wall...
Let's all vote Ostrog and rock the establishment.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Leave a comment:
-
.......have no fear, Cap"n will be getting a good coating from Debs shortly over this!
Leave a comment:
-
'Honestly, have you ever heard more nonsense than the "Kosminski was the Ripper" argument?'
Indeed I have, Simon, in that some claim Tumblety was the Ripper.
But it all sort of comes down to the documents that have been produced to emphasis the case for Kosminski and Tumblety, doesn't it?
Normally the horse bolts before the stable door is closed, but in these curious cases we have the horse stabled and the door bolted, and then the blasted creation walks through the wall... and we are left staring at a dried turd on stable floor.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
Honestly, have you ever heard more nonsense than the "Kosminski was the Ripper" argument?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by robhouse View PostI think it is relevant to point out that in the marginalia Swanson wrote "known to Scotland Yard head officers of CID", underlining "head". It has been suggested that this sentence referred to Anderson's comment about the "Jack the Ripper letter." But it seems at least as likely, if not more so, that it instead referred to the previous sentence... the one which was underlined and highlighted by Swanson (with a vertical line). The sentence about "subordinate officers of the department" and not violating the unwritten rule of the service. In other words, I think Swanson may have underlined this phrase, and then added the remark about "head officers" in the next available space.
If this conjecture is correct, then it seems to imply that the whole Kozminski affair may have been a secret, known only to certain "head officials" at CID. In other words, it is entirely possible that "Abberline, Dew, Reid and others such as Godley" did not know much of anything about Kozminski, or at least not the details. The same might go for Smith.
You may well be completely right but on the other hand you may well be completely wrong. I'm sure that you're right about 'head officials' knowing what's what about the closure of the case but who names Kosminski except for MM in his strange document discovered 70 odd years later and the author of the later additions to the Swanson Marginalia that appeared 100 years later?
Nobody.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostGoing through the motions? Quite possibly, Stephen, but to what end?
Catching and more importantly convicting Sadler(The Ripper) would have enhanced Swanson's career no end.
Leave a comment:
-
Rob,
I could accept that Dew,Reid and Godley may not have been in on Anderson"s secret which he said was a " definitely ascertainable fact"--"-well known" among the police he said.But for the head of the City of London Police,Major Smith to be kept in the dark and by the look of things the Assistant Commissioner ,Macnaghten ,that all seems highly unlikely,Rob,
Best
Norma
Leave a comment:
-
Going through the motions? Quite possibly, Stephen, but to what end?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
On 14th February 1891 why would Chief Inspector Donald Swanson have embarked upon an investigation into the possibility that James Sadler was ‘Jack the Ripper’ in the sure and certain knowledge that just seven days earlier ‘Jack the Ripper’ had been locked up in Colney Hatch Lunatic Asylum?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post...have you ever heard more nonsense than the "Kosminski was the Ripper" argument?
Leave a comment:
-
Hi again Simon,
I'll read Rob's book with pleasure and curiosity.
I'm sure it will be more convincing than Anderson complete works (reliés pleine peau).
In the meantime, I'll continue to find Grainger a stronger suspect than Kosminski.
Amitiés,
David
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: