Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Did The Ripper Remove Organs?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    It’s an important question Jon.

    At the inquest Dr Brown said: ”Before we removed the body Dr. Phillips was sent for, as I wished him to see the wounds, he having been engaged in a case of a similar kind previously. He saw the body at the mortuary.”.
    But there was no proper examination of the body at the crime scene if there had been, I have no doubt the organs would have been found missing if the killer had taken them, and it would have been documented, and we have no time for Dr Phillips viewing the body at the mortuary.



    Comment


    • #77
      So far the votes are unanimous that the killer took the organs, and I agree with this. However, Trevor Marriott presents an interesting theory worthy of consideration and not immediate dismissal. I like the originality of the theory and concede it is certainly possible that organs were stolen from the mortuary. It's a good theory. I just find it more probable they were removed by the killer. Whatever his time constraints, the killer had the time to remove the intestines of Chapman and Eddowes and place them above their shoulders. It's not a big leap from there to suggest he had the time to take an organ. In addition, Kelly's heart was noted absent while her body was at the crime scene.

      A good theory even if ultimately falsified generates new questions. As Tom Wescott points out, maybe Trevor is on to something about errors in the conventional timeline, particularly for Eddowes. This raises lots of things to investigate. The theory has now done its job to advance our knowledge of the case, even if it is incorrect.
      Last edited by Barnaby; Today, 04:42 AM.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by Kattrup View Post

        Hello Gbinoz

        I am not sure which question you’re talking about, something discussed in this thread or the nurse’s opinion.
        The posts I referred to were you posting an opinion from a nurse experienced in modern-day hysterectomies that removing the uterus without damaging surrounding organs in the (as far as I know unspecified) time slot available, was impossible.
        The problem is that there actually was damage to surrounding organs. So the nurse’s opinion is of zero value. This is besides the “hysterectomy “ - of course it was nothing of the kind, making the comparison moot - performed on Eddowes hardly conforming to modern, somewhat less intrusive methods than those employed by JtR.

        Hi Kattrup,

        Just by way of clarification, the question was posed to the nurse and was: could an abdominal hysterectomy be performed on a subject laying on the ground in near darkness in nine minutes without damaging the bladder. Damage to surrounding organs was not part of the question. So it is your problem with the question that is of zero value, not the answer. The nurse commented that the bladder is in the way of an abdominal hysterectomy, and that she had observed surgeons of high repute, operating in a modern theatre with full lighting and assistance and far more time than nine minutes, nick the bladder. Brown's "expert practitioner" nicked the bladder in his operation, of which the extent and conditions are unknown. The person who removed Eddowes uterus didn't.

        IF Lawende did see Eddowes, the nine minutes available to the ripper had to also include taking her into Mitre Sq, subduing her, opening her clothing, making an incision which skirted around the navel, removing her intestines, performing the hysterectomy without nicking the bladder, removing a section of colon to give access to the kidney, removing the kidney, making the delicate cuts to her eyelids, rifling her possessions and making his escape.

        I don't see nine minutes as a realistic time, but clock syncs have to be taken into account and considerations such as whether Watkins might have gotten behind on his beat by sheltering from the rain and decided to make up the time by skipping Mitre Sq, or Trevor's solution.
        Last edited by GBinOz; Today, 04:40 AM.

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

          Well the bodies were left at the mortuaries for up to 10 hours before the post-mortems were carried out, so plenty of time

          The term organ thief is probably not the right terminology, body dealers is the correct term used who it is documented were active at mortuaries in the East End at that time. They operated along with corrupt mortuary attendants so easy access to bodies

          For further reading, Professor Elizabeth Hurren a lecturer at Leicester, has published several books on the activities of Victorian Body Dealers

          www.trevormarriott.co.uk
          Thanks Trev, I`m not doubting the existence of body dealers. I just can`t see when someone would have the opportunity to get at the bodies.
          For example, Chapman was taken to the mortuary at 7am and the post mortem was at 2pm. Robert Mann stayed with the body until the two nurses come in to undress the body prior to the post mortem. There was no window of opportunity.

          Eddowes was taken to Golden Lane Mortuary at 3am, which was a relatively new building, had a coroners court attached to the mortuary and was a secure building. The post mortem was at 4.30pm. Between 3am and 4.30pm Eddowes was stripped, photographed, the body is sketched, apron pieces are compared. When and how did someone get access to the body ?

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Jon Guy View Post

            Thanks Trev, I`m not doubting the existence of body dealers. I just can`t see when someone would have the opportunity to get at the bodies.
            For example, Chapman was taken to the mortuary at 7am and the post mortem was at 2pm. Robert Mann stayed with the body until the two nurses come in to undress the body prior to the post mortem. There was no window of opportunity.
            From the Chapman Inquest:

            Sergeant Baugham [Badham], 31 H, stated that he conveyed the body of the deceased to the mortuary on the ambulance.
            [Coroner] Are you sure that you took every portion of the body away with you? - Yes.
            [Coroner] Where did you deposit the body? - In the shed, still on the ambulance. I remained with it until Inspector Chandler arrived. Detective-Sergeant Thicke viewed the body, and I took down the description.

            Inspector Chandler, recalled, said he reached the mortuary a few minutes after seven. The body did not appear to have been disturbed. He did not stay until the doctor arrived. Police-constable 376 H was left in charge, with the mortuary keeper. Robert Marne, the mortuary keeper and an inmate of the Whitechapel Union Workhouse, said he received the body at seven o'clock on Saturday morning. He remained at the mortuary until Dr. Phillips came. The door of the mortuary was locked except when two nurses from an infirmary came and undressed the body. No one else touched the corpse. He gave the key into the hands of the police.

            Also from the Chapman inquest:

            Sarah Simonds, a resident nurse at the Whitechapel Infirmary, stated that, in company of the senior nurse, she went to the mortuary on Saturday, and found the body of the deceased on the ambulance in the yard. It was afterwards taken into the shed, and placed on the table.
            Last edited by GBinOz; Today, 07:04 AM.

            Comment


            • #81
              For those who find Prosector's 72 page thread somewhat daunting, there are some interesting comments regarding that thread made by Wickerman in Post #2 here:

              I have heard many say that the Ripper had at least SOME rudimentary knowledge of anatomy and such as that. This may be best answered by butchers, hunters, and surgeons, but are there ways of doing what the Ripper did and not have a whole lot of blood get on him? Could he have cut and such in such a way to minimize a mess?

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by Jon Guy View Post

                Thanks Trev, I`m not doubting the existence of body dealers. I just can`t see when someone would have the opportunity to get at the bodies.
                For example, Chapman was taken to the mortuary at 7am and the post mortem was at 2pm. Robert Mann stayed with the body until the two nurses come in to undress the body prior to the post mortem. There was no window of opportunity.

                Eddowes was taken to Golden Lane Mortuary at 3am, which was a relatively new building, had a coroners court attached to the mortuary and was a secure building. The post mortem was at 4.30pm. Between 3am and 4.30pm Eddowes was stripped, photographed, the body is sketched, apron pieces are compared. When and how did someone get access to the body
                Hi Jon
                If the body dealers were working with a corrupt mortuary attendant, then they could have been given access to the mortuary at any time of the day or night by the mortuary attendant. If it is suggested that the killer took the organs in such a short time,I have to ask how long would it have taken a body dealer to access a victims abdomen which had already been opened up by the killer and remove organs.

                With regards to Chapman not only was the uterus taken but the fallopian tubes which were attached to the uterus, In the pics I have posted the fallopian tubes are highlighted and would be difficult to find and remove in the dark.

                www.trevormarriott.co.uk

                Click image for larger version  Name:	Picture 7 Uterus and fallopian tubes.jpg Views:	0 Size:	120.8 KB ID:	854163 Click image for larger version  Name:	Picture 9 Uterus and falllopian tubes after removal.jpg Views:	0 Size:	186.7 KB ID:	854164
                Last edited by Trevor Marriott; Today, 07:08 AM.

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
                  So...Did the Ripper have a full 15 minutes alone in the square to 'work'?

                  Yours truly,

                  Tom Wescott
                  No chance.


                  The key attribute that the killer displayed... speed!


                  The Ripper wouldn't have stayed in that square for more than 7 minutes...at a push.


                  He liked risk...but he wasn't stupid.


                  Stupid killers get caught.
                  "Great minds, don't think alike"

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X