Did The Ripper Remove Organs?

[Sam Flynn]

Also, Gareth, why would organ robbers/traders be interested in a piece of belly wall?

Exactly, especially since the victims were taken to different mortuaries, staffed by different personnel, who ALL happened to be into selling the odd organ now and then. "Here's a left kidney... come back next week and I'll sell you the other one".

The whole idea is utterly preposterous.

[Tom_Wescott]

I'm going through an old thread called Jack's Escape from Mitre Square. I'm on page 31 of 113, so you can imagine my current mood. It's fascinating Herlock should happen to open two similar threads! But reading Trevor's old posts and the responses to him, something occurs to me. Two separate points are being argued as one. The First Point is Trevor's opinion that Sequeira was bonkers for suggesting 3 minutes for everything we see in the square and that Brown was too conservative for suggesting 'at least 5 minutes'. First thing I want to say is that Trevor's point is valid and he doesn't appear to have a suspect-based agenda. He's genuinely perplexed by how SO MUCH could have taken place in the darkest corner of Mitre Square in such a short amount of time and he's asking us to challenge accepted wisdom. I totally champion that. And I don't disagree with him.

I'm not as dogged as Trevor in insisting it couldn't have all taken place in that time, but I'm suspicious. One of Trevor's old posts brought up a point I hadn't considered before. Tons of sources point out Sequeira's '3 minutes' and Brown's 'At least 5 minutes'. But Trevor provided context by printing the question asked by the Star reporter. Here's Trevor's post: 'In the final edition there are the two interesting quotes, from Dr Brown, and Sequeira. Brown was asked a specific question by the reporter “How long would it have taken him (the killer) to mutilate the body as you found it” Brown replied “At least five minutes” Sequeira when asked the same question and states “three minutes”.'

I've never dug into this question until now so this was eye-opening to me. The question was '...as you found it'. As Trevor points out, when they found it, they didn't know any organs were missing.

Joshua Rogan and others point out that the Star interview was published 24 hours following the autopsy, so it's certainly possible the autopsy had already occurred. Trevor argues it had not happened yet at the time the interview occurred. I don't know. Rogan offers this excerpt from The Daily News (Oct. 5th): "Dr. Brown added that for the purpose of practically testing the time required for what had been done to this unfortunate woman, an expert practitioner had actually performed the operation, and found that it took three minutes and a half." This is interesting! The timing falls in line with what Sequeira said. But does that mean the Ripper was also an 'expert practiitioner'? Should Brown have asked a butcher or fish porter to participate? Did they turn the lights off first? Was the body on the ground? You know, control methods. We'll never know. But if the Ripper wasn't an 'expert practitioner' then we might perhaps conclude it would take him longer than 3 1/2 minutes. Another factor to consider is that the doctors only offered estimates on the injuries. Not the walk to the corner, any conversation that took place, rendering Kate unconscious, pilfering her pockets, cutting off half a large apron, maneuvering her skirts, and his escape. All of these things add time and have to be figured in by us. Is it possible the Ripper did all this AND inflicted the injuries he did in Sequeira's 3 minutes? Not a chance. What about in Brown's 'at least five minutes'? We're getting a bit closer to possibility.

Trevor has identified what he considers to be a problem with accepted wisdom and he's presented contemporary documentation and modern research to back his argument. This is argument number one. Convinced all this couldn't have happened in the time allowed by Lawende/Harvey/Watkins, Trevor offers his solution - that the Ripper didn't take the organs. They were removed at the mortuary. This is argument number two.

Argument #1 - Baby

Argument #2 - Bathwater

I can honestly say I see no merit in the argument that the Ripper didn't take the organs. This has been around for years (Bob Hinton) and I have considered it before and it just doesn't fly. One body, maybe. Three? Come on. But in throwing out this dirty bathwater, are we also throwing out the baby?

Could Trevor have posed a legitimate problem but offered the wrong solution?

If we assume the perspective (whether we hold it or not) that the Ripper needed more than 5 minutes - maybe several more than 5 - to do everything he did (not just the medical stuff!), then how does that impact the timeline as structured by Lawende/Harvey Watkins? Or does it impact it?

I'm not asking these questions to then hoist my answer on you. I don't have one. Yet. I would love others to think on this and provide your considered response. I'm going to keep reading posts old and new and thinking on it myself. All I can think now is if Brown's estimate is too conservative then maybe the problem is the timeline imposed on the Ripper by other witnesses.

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott

[Abby Normal]

hi tom
Three minutes probably not. five minutes possibly yes but i think maybe a couple minutes longer. remember by the time of eddowes the ripper has had real life experience subduing, cutting and or mutilating in similar circs at least three women (nichols, chapman, stride) but imho five (millwood, tabram, nichols, chapman, stride) and those are just the ones we know of. And the ripper at least probably had alot of experience using the knife and some anatomical experience. so theres that base experience too.

put it all together and seven to eight minutes seems reasonable to me. plus he had about fifty minutes from the lawende sighting till the discovery of her body so alot of wiggle room in there too.

the ripper cut up her face, slit her throat, gutted her and pulled her intestines out, so imho cutting out her organs and taking them after all that does not seem all that extra.

so for me trevors points are all bathwater and no baby.

[GBinOz]

Could Trevor have posed a legitimate problem but offered the wrong solution?

If we assume the perspective (whether we hold it or not) that the Ripper needed more than 5 minutes - maybe several more than 5 - to do everything he did (not just the medical stuff!), then how does that impact the timeline as structured by Lawende/Harvey Watkins? Or does it impact it?

I'm not asking these questions to then hoist my answer on you. I don't have one. Yet. I would love others to think on this and provide your considered response. I'm going to keep reading posts old and new and thinking on it myself. All I can think now is if Brown's estimate is too conservative then maybe the problem is the timeline imposed on the Ripper by other witnesses.

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott

Hi Tom,

It should be that Brown's "expert practitioner" failed to avoid nicking the bladder.

There is an old thread titled "Did he have anatomical knowledge?" by Prosector, a surgeon and teacher. It is 72 pages, but about the first five are most interesting. Prosector is not flattering in his opinion of Sequeira.

https://forum.casebook.org/forum/ripper-discussions/motive-method-and-madness/7907-did-he-have-anatomical-knowledge

I also found some of the opinions in Trevor's video between about 16 minute mark and the 24 minute mark to be particularly interesting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpQqMtVVkzY&t=965s&ab_channel=dickcopy

Cheers, George

[GBinOz]

put it all together and seven to eight minutes seems reasonable to me. plus he had about fifty minutes from the lawende sighting till the discovery of her body so alot of wiggle room in there too.

I think you meant fifteen, didn't you?

My understanding is that the Lawende sighting was about 1:35 and the body was discovered at 1:44. About nine minutes. Of course clock syncs and time estimates also play a part.

[Abby Normal]

I think you meant fifteen, didn't you?

My understanding is that the Lawende sighting was about 1:35 and the body was discovered at 1:44. About nine minutes. Of course clock syncs and time estimates also play a part.

yes. thanks George I meant to say about fifteen not fifty.