Originally posted by Wickerman
View Post
If the individual who was responsible for that statement had witnessed it say, from the pub corner, and had given a time of about a quarter to one, then why do they not make an appearance at the inquest?
Why does Spooner not mention the chase?
If the 'chase' consisted of Louis 'chasing' Isaacs, then there was no real chase. So then the Schwartz account is at least partially false.
Back to the foreman's question. By associating the thrown down with the unlikelihood of holding onto the cachous, I think we have strong evidence that the foreman, and probably both Baxter and Phillips, new of the Schwartz incident, as told by Schwartz.
They seem to be giving it the thumbs down, yet the Echo/Star/People reports tell us that there was a throw down incident at some point.
It would seem Schwartz got it right to that extent, except for the time and place.
Then how did Wess - who supposedly has no association with Schwartz - get the same time and place as Schwartz, in the 'man pursued' report, and reiterate that time a few days later, in their own paper?
Seems we are missing an important piece of the puzzle.
Comment