Originally posted by DJA
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Motivation?
Collapse
X
-
Don't you think the doctors could tell if tissue had been removed from the skin, as opposed to simple cuts?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Joshua Rogan View PostThe cuts are consistent with the killer using his blade tip to close the eyes.
The right cut is under the eye.
The left cut is above the eyelid,for the most part.
It extends onto the eyelid,as a result of removing the Xanthelasma from above the eyelid.
Re posting a picture from previous page as an example.
Leave a comment:
-
The cuts are consistent with the killer using his blade tip to close the eyes.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
The rational for cuts to the internal organs, is, the cuts facilitate the removal of those organs.
Our question is, what is the rational for the cuts to the eyelids?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Harry D View Post
No one can answer the question, that's why.
Why did the Ripper take wombs from two of his victims and only the heart from another?
Our question is, what is the rational for the cuts to the eyelids?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DJA View Post
Xanthelasma is a rational explanation.
Pertains to research Sutton and Gull shared.
Sutton who treated Nichols and Eddowes,together as inpatients, for Rheumatic Fever from December 1867.
Same guy RLS's cousin Major Henry Smith had examine the "Lusk kidney".
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by erobitha View Post
With the exception of Stride obviously, all the mutilations carried the same kind of obliteration on the reproductive organs and genitalia. Often that is symbolic and means something to the killer. Could be the representation of the ability to give life. Could be a representation of sexual disgust.
The kidney of Eddowes and heart of Kelly might have been additional intrigue or further symbolism.
What is certain on the three victims mutilated outside, he was quick to get to the ritualistic parts that mattered to him most.
All we know is that the killer took a womb, a womb and a kidney, then a heart.
Whatever value or significance they held to him, is certainly beyond us.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Harry D View Post
No one can answer the question, that's why.
Why did the Ripper take wombs from two of his victims and only the heart from another?
The kidney of Eddowes and heart of Kelly might have been additional intrigue or further symbolism.
What is certain on the three victims mutilated outside, he was quick to get to the ritualistic parts that mattered to him most.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
I'm saying an argument requires a rational explanation. If you assume we cannot know the reason - that it is only known to the killer, this is both rational, and a means of avoiding the question.
Why did the Ripper take wombs from two of his victims and only the heart from another?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
I'm saying an argument requires a rational explanation. If you assume we cannot know the reason - that it is only known to the killer, this is both rational, and a means of avoiding the question.
Pertains to research Sutton and Gull shared.
Sutton who treated Nichols and Eddowes,together as inpatients, for Rheumatic Fever from December 1867.
Same guy RLS's cousin Major Henry Smith had examine the "Lusk kidney".
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: