Originally posted by Scott Nelson
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How did JtR see in the dark?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Rob1n View PostNot necessarily, there were plenty of plain clothes Police around, and if he were a Policeman in plain clothes, he'd also have issue equipment, whistle, truncheon, lamp etc.
MontyMonty
https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif
Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Comment
-
-
DCs were not issued with lamps.
MontyMonty
https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif
Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Comment
-
You can also turn this question around. How did his victims see in the dark? Were they able to navigate freely or were they somehow reduced to taking baby steps with both hands outstretched so they wouldn't bump into something? If conditions were such that his victims could see then it stands to reason that so could Jack.
c.d.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
To my mind, the difference might be that for the most part victims knew the streets and alleys in daylight, so can walk them at night without stumbling.
Whether this also applies to the killer will depend on whether he was a local or not.
Where I have reservations is the lamp theory. That the killer might have used one.
I can't imagine the killer having a free hand to hold the lamp while he strangles & mutilates a victim.
If he puts the lamp down on the ground while he opens the abdomen, the lamp will not cast light into the abdomen. It needs to be held above the body to cast light down.
He needs a third hand, and if he hangs it from his jacket (buttonhole?) he'll burn his face.
It's another non-starter theory in my view.Last edited by Wickerman; 11-03-2018, 03:42 PM.Regards, Jon S.
- Likes 2
Comment
Comment