Originally posted by APerno
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Geoprofile of Jack the Ripper reveals Tabram and Nichols connection.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sleuth1888 View PostWell if the body wasn't there then of course he wouldn't see it.
the body wasn't there-he would have seen it.either that or he was the killer and lied.
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostA few people argue that, but I'm not one of them. To my mind, there's no way he could have missed the body."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
agreed sam, if he could see well enough to see the basement door and cut some leather from his boot-which also he sat on the step and was also looking down at his foot-he would have seen the body-no question IMHO.
There seems to be a contradiction regarding light. We say: 'light enough to see the body' but then we say, 'he must have had some anatomic knowledge to remove the uterus in complete darkness.'
So which is it? The light seems to be relative to the argument being made.
(Ouch! Sorry, that one slipped out.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
agreed sam, if he could see well enough to see the basement door and cut some leather from his boot-which also he sat on the step and was also looking down at his foot-he would have seen the body-no question IMHO.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by APerno View Post
I agree with all that the body was likely not there . . . but if we state that there was enough light to "cut some leather from his boot" then we need to rethink just how dark it was when the Ripper cut open Annie.
There seems to be a contradiction regarding light. We say: 'light enough to see the body' but then we say, 'he must have had some anatomic knowledge to remove the uterus in complete darkness.'
So which is it? The light seems to be relative to the argument being made.
(Ouch! Sorry, that one slipped out.)
it was never complete darkness at any of the ripper murder scenes."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
Fish did some diagrams to try and show how Richardson could have missed the corpse (I’m sure that you remember Abby, Sam was in the discussion too) but I just find it close to impossible to believe. You have to have Richardson acting pretty weirdly and sitting in an unlikely position and not looking in certain directions. That particular debate was a chore. Fish was adamant though. And wrong.
oh yes I remember it well-his diagrams inspired me back then to post my own diagram. lol. I agree a lot with fish but not on this point-and posted it as a bit of fun-I think fish got a little chuckle out of it too.
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Tabram was indeed a victim of the same physical entity "JtR".
The first canonical? The first seen-all-the-way-through trademark , for sure.
I would include all previous attacks recorded earlier that year as well.
Crossingham's had a few skeletons up their closet. Literally.
And right where MJK's loiterer stood .... yet another "coincidence"
Focusing on the strategic scattering of the buildings and the interactions between pinpointed attack women resided therein would have saved a lot of sanity in Abberline
(in his place, I would have become a raging alcoholic, I admit)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lipsky View PostTabram was indeed a victim of the same physical entity "JtR".
The first canonical? The first seen-all-the-way-through trademark , for sure.
Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostThe term "canonical", such as it is, is a shorthand for "one of the Macnaghten Five". Rightly or wrongly, the first "canonical" will always be Polly Nichols.
The date of Martha's murder also had a significance.
Comment
-
One objection to Geographic profiling, among others, is the "Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy."
Comment
Comment