Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Geoprofile of Jack the Ripper reveals Tabram and Nichols connection.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post"Private part" could encompass the pubic mound, the labia majora, crotch, groin or even anus. The vagina is, specifically, the female private part that's sunk into the body, but it's not the only private part. In the same way, the male's "private parts" include the pubic mound, anus, groin, penis, scrotum and/or testicles. The private parts are, in short, the "naughty bits" that are normally kept hidden from view; it's a euphemistic term which is not specific, nor reserved for one organ in particular.
Taking your lead, and I'm not being facetious, a woman might consider her breasts to be "private parts" as well, but they're already accounted for in Tabram's case.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostSo what does it mean then?
Taking your lead, and I'm not being facetious, a woman might consider her breasts to be "private parts" as well, but they're already accounted for in Tabram's case.Last edited by Sam Flynn; 11-01-2018, 09:14 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostSwanson. Sept. 1888 report.
‘Dr. Keeling [sic] of 68 Brick Lane was called, and examined the body and found thirty nine wounds on body, and neck, and private part with a knife or dagger.’
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostThe legit ones (Queensberry rules) probably held in Blue Coat Boy pub on Dorset Street and then the illegal ones on the streets and courts (no Queensberry rules).
John Reeves gives an account hearing fighting on the streets that night.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View PostSo you imagine that stabs to the stomach were usually described as stabs to the lower part? And stabs to the vagina would invariably have been described as such in the press without the use of a euphemism?
You'll be telling us that 'unfortunates' were simply unlucky women next.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostSwanson. Sept. 1888 report.
‘Dr. Keeling [sic] of 68 Brick Lane was called, and examined the body and found thirty nine wounds on body, and neck, and private part with a knife or dagger.’
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostWere stabbings to lower parts that rare? I would think most stabbings would mostly involve a knife to the belly as the target area. Plenty of those.
Nothing like acts on unfortunates' vaginas though.
You'll be telling us that 'unfortunates' were simply unlucky women next.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostBut different in respect of detail. A blunt object thrust into the vagina is different from two small stabs to the private part (precise location unspecified), a three inch cut on the private part (precise location unspecified), the complete cutting away of the external genitalia concurrent with the removal of flesh from the inner thighs and buttocks, or the internal cutting of the vagina in consequence of removing the uterus (whilst leaving the external genitalia unscathed).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostAll of those are rare, remember? Even if you have "on, in, near", together, that is still extremely rare.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View PostCan you direct me two the source where it is made explicit that Tabram's wound to the lower part was to her vagina.
‘Dr. Keeling [sic] of 68 Brick Lane was called, and examined the body and found thirty nine wounds on body, and neck, and private part with a knife or dagger.’
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: