Here is another LE connection...
Whitehall Mystery.
Oct 1 1888 - Torso found in the three-month-old vault that made up part of the cellar of the Scotland Yard building development.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
JtR was Law Enforcement Hypothesis
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Monty View PostI could not find one Police Order stating th issuing of rubber sold boots.
If they were used, they were not regulation IMHO.
Monty
Leave a comment:
-
I could not find one Police Order stating th issuing of rubber sold boots.
If they were used, they were not regulation IMHO.
Monty
Leave a comment:
-
Mary Ann Cox
[Coroner] Did his boots sound as if the heels were heavy ? - There was no sound as he went up the court.
[Coroner] Then you think that his boots were down at heels ? - He made no noise.
I think its very interesting that here is an example of what we would expect JtR to sound like. Silent.
Reminds me of those special issue rubber soles that PCs had.
Leave a comment:
-
It is interesting how in one version the PC said the man was working with him and was in good standing with the community and in this one wants nothing to do with him.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Pcdunn View PostSearching for a knife or blood droplets by deliberately "crossing and recrossing the street" is my first thought. So maybe a plain-clothes detective, hence the "respectable citizen" comment?
I think, however, that the mention of the "blotchy faced man with the carroty mousthace" ( in the next paragraph of the news article about the Stepney clerk's report) is about another man in a different location, and not a description of the above-mentioned respectable citizen.
I'm not following you here, the mention of a blotchy faced man, and him crossing the street back and forth, is all part of the same paragraph.
Would you mind pointing out where you see a divide?
A SUSPECTED INDIVIDUAL
"Mr. Galloway, a clerk employed in the C**** and living at Stepney, has made the following statement: "As I was going down the Whitechapel-road in the early hours of Wednesday morning, on my way home, I saw a man coming in the opposite direction, about fifty yards away. We both crossed the road simultaneously, and came face to face. The man had a very frightened appearance, and glared at me as he passed. I was very much struck with his appearance, especially as he corresponded, in almost every particular, with the man described by Mary Ann Cox. He was short, stout, about 35 to 40 years of age. His moustache, not a particular heavy one, was of a carroty colour, and his face was blotchy through drink and dissipation. He wore a long, dirty, brown overcoat, and altogether presented a most villainous Appearance. I stood still and watched him. He darted back almost immediately to the other side of the road, and then, apparently to avoid a group of women a little further on, crossed the road again. I determined to follow him, and just before reaching the coffee-stall past the church he again crossed the road. On nearing George-yard he crossed over and entered a small court. He reappeared in a couple of minutes, crossed Whitechapel-road for the sixth time, and preceeded up Commercial-street. Up to this point he had walked along briskly, but directly he got into Commercial-street he slackened speed and accosted the first woman whom he met alone, but was repulsed. On approaching Thrawl-street, a policeman on point duty suddenly appeared. The man was evidently startled, and for a moment it looked as though he would turn back or cross the road. He recovered himself, however, and went on. I then informed the constable of what I had seen, and pointed out the man's extraordinary resemblance to the individual described by Cox. The constable declined to arrest the man, saying that he was looking for a man of a very different appearance."
Last edited by Wickerman; 09-30-2018, 01:35 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostWhat does this scenario suggest to you?
What was happening?
I think, however, that the mention of the "blotchy faced man with the carroty mousthace" ( in the next paragraph of the news article about the Stepney clerk's report) is about another man in a different location, and not a description of the above-mentioned respectable citizen.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Monty View PostBullseye lamps were standard issue until the 1920s, when the battery lamps kindly shown by Batman were used.
I’ve a P.O. from 1888 which gives a daily timetable of when the Mets lamp man would visit the various stations to give them the once over, conduct any repairs and refill them. If memory serves, it was something like 7am till 9:30am for H division. It’s in my book...I really must read it one day.
Monty
😉
Leave a comment:
-
Bullseye lamps were standard issue until the 1920s, when the battery lamps kindly shown by Batman were used.
I’ve a P.O. from 1888 which gives a daily timetable of when the Mets lamp man would visit the various stations to give them the once over, conduct any repairs and refill them. If memory serves, it was something like 7am till 9:30am for H division. It’s in my book...I really must read it one day.
Monty
😉
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostThe same character with the awkward gait was described as having a weird look about his eyes, an "unnatural glare".
A young man seen by Bowyer speaking to Kelly on Wednesday evening had "very peculiar eyes".
At the Bricklayers Arms, talking with Stride, a man who "had rather weak eyes. I mean he had sore eyes without any eyelashes".
So, it's not only the peculiar gait, but "peculiar eyes".
Was it the same man?Last edited by jerryd; 09-29-2018, 07:39 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Scott Nelson View PostBut I thought your premise was that the Ripper stayed in Mitre Sq. after the murder. Did he leave and later return when it was full of policemen? If so, how did he get back in?
And what's "LE" stand for?
I was wondering where he went for 40 min. I suppose he may never have left might explain it.
Waited for a crowd to show.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostPeople were cutting through gardens and sometimes just going through someone's unlocked front door and out the back ending up in a Chapman type garden with a fence or two to hop before you are on the other side of nowhere.
And what's "LE" stand for?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostBlotchy faces and awkward walking can be associated with conditions resulting from sexually transmitted diseases like syphilis. I believe they were on some pretty crazy drugs for it back then like mercury or something. Could explain why JtR was mad as a hatter.
A young man seen by Bowyer speaking to Kelly on Wednesday evening had "very peculiar eyes".
At the Bricklayers Arms, talking with Stride, a man who "had rather weak eyes. I mean he had sore eyes without any eyelashes".
So, it's not only the peculiar gait, but "peculiar eyes".
Was it the same man?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostA man seen running along Hanbury street about 6:00am the morning of the murder.
"He was hurrying from Hanbury-street, below where the murder took place, into Brick-lane. He was walking, almost running, and had a peculiar gait, his knees not bending when he walked......... He was dressed in a dark stiff hat and cutaway coat, reaching to his knees. His face was clean shaven, and he seemed about 30 years old."
Remember the man who accosted Lewis & Kennedy in Bethnal Green Rd?
The same one outside the Britannia on Friday morning, Nov. 9th.
"Further, it was stated that he was a man of medium stature, with dark moustache, and that he had an extremely awkward gait, which could at once be recognised."
Maybe BS-man wasn't drunk at all, just an extremely awkward gait?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: