True very unlikely. Could they have been placed in her hand?
GSG because of Schwartz?
Collapse
X
-
-
-
scenario
Hello Rocky.
"The actions of Bs & pipeman seem so strange . . ."
So strange that the story can be seen as made up?
". . . we don't know what the assault was over if it wasn't murder?"
Exactly. There should have been no assault in that short time.
"What was pipeman doing just walking up and throwing Stride down?"
Pipeman?
"And pipeman already in a doorway when BS man grabbed Stride."
A building long since closed.
"Did BS man go to get cachous for Stride while pipeman & Liz waited?"
Assault someone then buy "candy"?
"What building was pipeman standing in the doorway of"
A pub.
Cheers.
LC
Comment
-
cheers lc i meant to say what was BS man doing throwing her down. Were the candies ever traced to a nearby shop? I wonder which pub. but yes perhaps the cachous were placed as a joke in liz hand after all the ripper seems to have a taunting nature. I see you think the story is made up? Why would schwartz make up the story? IF it was true do you think pipeman & BS knew each other? working together or pipeman is a witness like schwartz who bs man calls lipski, pipeman flees long enough so schwartz no longer places him at the scene then goes back and kills stride. It seems more likely to me they may have been working together. But it's very fascinating that pipeman was identified because i think he's one of the best candidates as he can be placed at the scene of an attack on a woman who was killed within minutes. It would make sense that the police also talked to the ripper in the course of the investigation but i didnt catch on or didnt have anything on him. I'd love to know who pipeman was and what he told the police?Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Rocky.
"The actions of Bs & pipeman seem so strange . . ."
So strange that the story can be seen as made up?
". . . we don't know what the assault was over if it wasn't murder?"
Exactly. There should have been no assault in that short time.
"What was pipeman doing just walking up and throwing Stride down?"
Pipeman?
"And pipeman already in a doorway when BS man grabbed Stride."
A building long since closed.
"Did BS man go to get cachous for Stride while pipeman & Liz waited?"
Assault someone then buy "candy"?
"What building was pipeman standing in the doorway of"
A pub.
Cheers.
LC
Comment
-
Q & A
Hello Rocky. Thanks.
"Were the candies ever traced to a nearby shop?'
No.
" I wonder which pub?"
The Nelson.
". . . but yes perhaps the cachous were placed as a joke in Liz's hand. . ."
You mean when he was interrupted before he could mutilate?
". . . after all the ripper seems to have a taunting nature."
Based on . . . ?
"I see you think the story is made up? Why would Schwartz make up the story?"
To ease the pressure on #40 Berner.
"IF it was true do you think pipeman & BS knew each other?"
No.
"Working together or pipeman is a witness like Schwartz who bs man calls lipski, pipeman flees long enough so Schwartz no longer places him at the scene then goes back and kills Stride."
Whilst Liz waits, in suspended animation?
"It seems more likely to me they may have been working together."
Why so far apart?
"But it's very fascinating that pipeman was identified. . ."
He wasn't.
Cheers.
LC
Comment
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Rocky. Thanks.
"Were the candies ever traced to a nearby shop?'
No.
" I wonder which pub?"
The Nelson.
". . . but yes perhaps the cachous were placed as a joke in Liz's hand. . ."
You mean when he was interrupted before he could mutilate?
". . . after all the ripper seems to have a taunting nature."
Based on . . . ?
"I see you think the story is made up? Why would Schwartz make up the story?"
To ease the pressure on #40 Berner.
"IF it was true do you think pipeman & BS knew each other?"
No.
"Working together or pipeman is a witness like Schwartz who bs man calls lipski, pipeman flees long enough so Schwartz no longer places him at the scene then goes back and kills Stride."
Whilst Liz waits, in suspended animation?
"It seems more likely to me they may have been working together."
Why so far apart?
"But it's very fascinating that pipeman was identified. . ."
He wasn't.
Cheers.
LC
good point well who gave her the cachous and would it be possible for her to grib them during an attack or were they placed in her hand which is more likely?
Comment
-
-
Even if Schwartz didn't really have the experience he claimed to have then there still is a reason to wonder if the GSG and the Berner Street murder have some connection,..because a message that seems to be asserting that Jews will evade blame for something on a night when Jews would certainly have been trying to evade blame for something seems eerily co-incidental.Originally posted by Batman View PostIf JtR was interrupted by Schwartz and made the racial slur 'Lipski' would this not explain the second anti-semetic statement, the GSG, as a comment about Schwartz?
Basically JtR is saying in the GSG that Jews (like Schwartz) are ignorant and to blame.
We know that the cloth is the link to the Mitre Square murder, and we might have a link to the Berner Street murder with the writing, but does that mean definitively that they both were committed by the same person? Could the murderer in Mitre have been attempting to distance himself from Berner Street....the placement of the cloth and writing in an entrance to Model Homes that to my knowledge did have a least one resident linked with the club seems to be interesting, but I wonder what the author thought the Jews should be blamed for?
Cheers
Comment
-
pocket
Hello Rocky. Thanks.
Don't see EITHER as likely. She likely had them in her pocket.
Cheers.
LC
Comment
-
No. It isn't anti semitic. I still don't know why people keep thinking that it is.Originally posted by Batman View PostIf JtR was interrupted by Schwartz and made the racial slur 'Lipski' would this not explain the second anti-semetic statement, the GSG, as a comment about Schwartz?
Mikehuh?
Comment
-
good story
Hello Michael.
"It isn't anti semitic. I still don't know why people keep thinking that it is."
Umm, because it makes a good story?
Cheers.
LC
Comment
-

Comment