If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Unless the hoaxer counted on people going out of their way to believe it.
I didn't quite understand that. If the hoaxer counted on people just accepting a hoax, why would he/she go to the trouble of matching diseased organ with diseased organ? Why not just take any old kidney because the letter sells the package anyway?
The piece of kidney can be debated as the reports from different medicos vary somewhat. One said that both the Lusk kidney and the remaining piece in the body had Bright's disease. Openshaw confirmed that the kidney belonged to a woman of about 45 years old and who was an alcoholic, as did the piece left in the body. Smith said that the kidney was put in spirits within a few hours after its removal, so that it couldn't have come from a hospital as they would have used a charging fluid called formalin. Later, Brown seemed to contradict himself. He did add, however, the condition of the right kidney. The symptoms he listed point to Bright's disease as well. So, if we have a hoax, it was done by someone who saw the medical report which is possible, but then had to go out and find a kidney to match, which is also possible except that any medical place would have used formalin to charge the organ...or one is lead to believe.
There is a lot here that has to be considered in making this a hoax.
Cheers,
Mike
IF it was a hoax it was either a damn good one or they got incredibly lucky.
G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Also, not sure if this has been stated before, but in terms of Dear boss and saucy jack letters, the main hoax culprits put forth of Bulling and Moore from the Central News agency-there handwriting does not match, so there's a check mark against that journalist hoaxer theory.
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Out of curiosity - how many examples are there of cases involving murder or serial murder, where the public has mailed "fake" body parts to the police in order to create an impression that they were from the killer?
Is this something that belongs to the practical joke tradition of Britain, or are there parallel examples from elsewhere?
Also, not sure if this has been stated before, but in terms of Dear boss and saucy jack letters, the main hoax culprits put forth of Bulling and Moore from the Central News agency-there handwriting does not match, so there's a check mark against that journalist hoaxer theory.
The thing, it could have been a hoax. Yet what I hear from police officials who believe, seems to be a rumor that's been passed around rather than anything substantive that proves it. Also, why just the one victim and a diseased kidney? If Tumblety (as some believe) had a collection of uteri, it would seem to me that they would be as easy as producing a diseased kidney. I do not rule out hoax by any means, but Lusk was scared $hitless by the thing and the match seems a good one...the match to the other kidney and the renal (whatever) piece the left kidney was attached to.
Out of curiosity - how many examples are there of cases involving murder or serial murder, where the public has mailed "fake" body parts to the police in order to create an impression that they were from the killer?
Is this something that belongs to the practical joke tradition of Britain, or are there parallel examples from elsewhere?
All the best,
Fisherman
Hi fish
That's a great question, never thought about that angle. Off the top of my head I would say never.
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
The thing, it could have been a hoax. Yet what I hear from police officials who believe, seems to be a rumor that's been passed around rather than anything substantive that proves it. Also, why just the one victim and a diseased kidney? If Tumblety (as some believe) had a collection of uteri, it would seem to me that they would be as easy as producing a diseased kidney. I do not rule out hoax by any means, but Lusk was scared $hitless by the thing and the match seems a good one...the match to the other kidney and the renal (whatever) piece the left kidney was attached to.
Mike
Hi mike
Right. In terms of the from hell letter and kidney, the rumor there was that it was a hoax from a medical student because you know, students are known for their pranks and it would be easy for medical student to get a hold of one.
I don't rule out hoax either but I lean toward it (say 60%) being from the killer.
The kidney just seems to be too much a match to eddowes.
Plus the letter rings true to me also. Especially since the writer did not sign it jack the ripper, like so many of the letters that appeared after Dear boss.
I have Letters from Hell and have read all the letters in it and to me the majority are such poor and obvious hoaxes. Other than the dear boss and from hell (and GSG for that matter) the only other one that stands out as possibly authentic is the 1896 "..winters coming" letter.
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
I have Letters from Hell and have read all the letters in it and to me the majority are such poor and obvious hoaxes. Other than the dear boss and from hell (and GSG for that matter) the only other one that stands out as possibly authentic is the 1896 "..winters coming" letter.
Hello Abby,
What is it about the "Winters coming..." letter that strikes you as credible?
What is it about the "Winters coming..." letter that strikes you as credible?
Thanks.
The handwriting, tone, structure and details/content of the letter strike me as authentic and similar to dear boss. The writer also references the GSG almost verbatim. The police took it seriously at the time, so much so that they compared it to dear boss, but ultimately decided it was a hoax.
I think it's also the last item in the police WCM file.
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
The handwriting, tone, structure and details/content of the letter strike me as authentic and similar to dear boss. The writer also references the GSG almost verbatim. The police took it seriously at the time, so much so that they compared it to dear boss, but ultimately decided it was a hoax.
I think it's also the last item in the police WCM file.
This is also the year that James Kelly came back to England and the police were supposed to meet him and didn't show, so he ran off again. Stayed there for a few years, according to him.
The handwriting, tone, structure and details/content of the letter strike me as authentic and similar to dear boss. The writer also references the GSG almost verbatim. The police took it seriously at the time, so much so that they compared it to dear boss, but ultimately decided it was a hoax.
I think it's also the last item in the police WCM file.
Mmmmm they compared it to "Dear Boss" which almost nobody accepts as genuine .
G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
This is the only letter that I think might be genuine who would be able to get hold of a human kidney?who would fork out the money to buy a human kidney?Why wasn't it addressed to "dear boss" and why wasn't it signed "jack the ripper"?Why send it to Mr lusk and not central news agency?
Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
This is the only letter that I think might be genuine who would be able to get hold of a human kidney?who would fork out the money to buy a human kidney?Why wasn't it addressed to "dear boss" and why wasn't it signed "jack the ripper"?Why send it to Mr lusk and not central news agency?
"It might turn out after all, to be the act of a Medical Student who would have no difficulty in obtaining the organ in question." - Inspector James McWilliam, City Police, 27 October 1888.
"...George Lusk was my grandfather. At the time of the murders he was a builder and well-known in the Whitechapel district, hence his Chairmanship of the Vigilance Committee. He lived at the time in Alderney Road which is not far from the London Hospital; I believe he either did some work in the hospital or for some of the staff and in later years he believed that the kidney was sent to him as a practical joke by someone in the London Hospital! This theory of his may of course have been a way of consoling himself for the fright he had when the parcel containing the kidney came to him through the post, he sought police protection for some days after." - Leonard Archer, 16 April 1966.
Comment