Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If the 'Dear Boss' letter is a hoax...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Steadmund Brand View Post
    Great minds think alike my friend.....when my brother saw my post he said..."no, Tony Danza" hahah so my Aussie twin and my real American brother share a brain ��

    Steadmund Brand
    Lol

    Couldn't think of Tony's name to save my life.

    Your brother must be a genius.

    Leave a comment:


  • Steadmund Brand
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    I thought it was that bloke off "Who's the Boss?"
    Great minds think alike my friend.....when my brother saw my post he said..."no, Tony Danza" hahah so my Aussie twin and my real American brother share a brain ��

    Steadmund Brand

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Robert St Devil View Post
    Hola G U T

    still...

    wouldn,t the press have some obligation to post a clarification or retraction?

    Or did...
    1. The fact that blame was laid on a reporter
    2. The phenomena of Jack the Ripper create a dilemma re: retractions
    3. The police never inform the press
    ...play a part?
    The press play a part in admitting one of their own was a hoaxer

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Steadmund Brand View Post
    Bruce Springsteen innit?

    Steadmund Brand
    I thought it was that bloke off "Who's the Boss?"

    Leave a comment:


  • Steadmund Brand
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    Who is the "Boss"?
    Bruce Springsteen innit?

    Steadmund Brand

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    Who is the "Boss"?
    Dr Thomas Horrocks Openshaw.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert St Devil
    replied
    Hola G U T

    still...

    wouldn,t the press have some obligation to post a clarification or retraction?

    Or did...
    1. The fact that blame was laid on a reporter
    2. The phenomena of Jack the Ripper create a dilemma re: retractions
    3. The police never inform the press
    ...play a part?

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Robert St Devil View Post
    I agree with the member who believes the author of DEAR BOSS may have been following the crimes in the news. While the killer was still known as ,,Leather Apron,, and throughout Sep88, there are separate press article mentions of Ann Chapman,s body being ,,ripped,, open; this occuring in the weeks prior to receivi g DEAR BOSS.

    If the police came to believe DEAR BOSS was the invention of a journalist, should a retraction have been expected? It seems like it was a treated as high profile evidence after the dual murders. Why would its treatment as authentic evidence have been allowed to continue in the media if the police knew better?
    Perhaps they only knew better, after the event.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert St Devil
    replied
    I agree with the member who believes the author of DEAR BOSS may have been following the crimes in the news. While the killer was still known as ,,Leather Apron,, and throughout Sep88, there are separate press article mentions of Ann Chapman,s body being ,,ripped,, open; this occuring in the weeks prior to receivi g DEAR BOSS.

    If the police came to believe DEAR BOSS was the invention of a journalist, should a retraction have been expected? It seems like it was a treated as high profile evidence after the dual murders. Why would its treatment as authentic evidence have been allowed to continue in the media if the police knew better?
    Last edited by Robert St Devil; 09-14-2016, 11:19 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • YomRippur
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Why would it upset theories, if it's a hoax, doesn't do much to any theory so far as I can see.
    I think there may be some theories that rely on who the writer was, whether it was the real killer or not. Can't remember which theories, but I've read some. As John said, those are probably poor theories, and we know there are an untold number of poor ones.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    ...then how do we reconcile Jack's promise to "clip the ladys ears off" with Eddowes' missing earlobe? Was the missing earlobe just an incidental act as Jack mutilated her face? Although this might be at odds with the precision of the killer's handiwork. Was it possible this information about the missing earlobe was leaked in time for someone to send the letter?
    Who is the "Boss"?

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by YomRippur View Post
    I just want to know who wrote the Dear Boss letter, hoax or not. I would imagine the identity of the writer would upset a lot of the existing theories about JTR.
    Why would it upset theories, if it's a hoax, doesn't do much to any theory so far as I can see.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by YomRippur View Post
    I just want to know who wrote the Dear Boss letter, hoax or not. I would imagine the identity of the writer would upset a lot of the existing theories about JTR.
    Yeah a lot of poor ones.

    Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • YomRippur
    replied
    I just want to know who wrote the Dear Boss letter, hoax or not. I would imagine the identity of the writer would upset a lot of the existing theories about JTR.

    Leave a comment:


  • Natasha
    replied
    Hi All

    There does seem to be alot of coincidences in the ripper case here is another or is it.......

    Liz Stride's ear; The lobe of the left ear was torn as if from the removal or wearing through of an earring
    Though it was thoroughly healed I thought it worth a mention

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X