He gave the police his name

[JadenCollins]

Instead of discussing "Pierre" in public, let's pm each other, because we all know how much he likes to stalk every post! He simply enjoys it! Just pm each other if ya'll wanna say something! We've clearly given him too much attention, he'll keep on making pointless threads, Pierre's an attention seeker!

[GUT]

It probably is. I've long since lost the plot about what Pierre means about anything. It's like trying to grasp a handful of mist. I just wish he'd stop with the metaphorical nonsense and the pseudo-intellectual BS and state what he actually means in his epistles in plain everyday English.

Well you can live in hope.

[GUT]

I may be mistaken, but it seems to me that Pierre's theory is almost entirely dependent on his subjective interpretation of metaphorical language contained in communications sent, purportedly, by the killer.

Now some of these communications he claims have a "low validity". However, clearly not the communication, or "data source", that is the subject of this thread: despite the suspect's name appearing in only metaphorical form Pierre confidently asserts: "There is now hardly any doubt. I must have found him."

Is that a reasonable assessment? Or am I missing something?

Seems to me what he's doing is making rubbish up then twisting things to fit saying we can't see it because it's metaphorical and we all ain't academic giants like he are.

[IchabodCrane]

Pierre, how about your statistical analysis to find the probability of the killer's metaphorical name being in your data source? Was it higher than 0.1% after all?
Maybe I missed a thread or two in between, but I feel there are many loose ends to tie up first before starting new Chapman threads.

[Pierre]

Pierre, how about your statistical analysis to find the probability of the killer's metaphorical name being in your data source? Was it higher than 0.1% after all?
Maybe I missed a thread or two in between, but I feel there are many loose ends to tie up first before starting new Chapman threads.

Hi,

Thanks a lot for reminding me. I will update you as soon as I have made it.

Regards, Pierre

[Bridewell]

Perhaps he gave them his address as well, Pierre:-

[Mike J. G.]

God, the whole Pierre saga was one boring load of bollocks. Did he ever come up with an actual suspect from "the data"?

[Geddy2112]

God, the whole Pierre saga was one boring load of bollocks. Did he ever come up with an actual suspect from "the data"?

'She' I believe, Kristina Nordqvist. She is acknowledged as helping Steve Blomer with his Inside Bucks Row Book. I think, but not 100% ended up with Kosminski but I can certainly in my younger years here remember her touting a PC. I think I left because of the whole Pierre goings on.

https://forum.casebook.org/forum/ripper-media/books/ripper-authors/737445-uncovenanted-by-kristina-nordqvist-aka-pierre

[Ms Diddles]

God, the whole Pierre saga was one boring load of bollocks. Did he ever come up with an actual suspect from "the data"?

I may be wrong about this, but didn't the data ultimately lead Pierre to the door of Caroline Maxwell's other half?!

I think that was her theory anyway (and the data never lies!).

[Geddy2112]

OMG I've just read the thread about her book, dear God. That's an hour I'll never get back. All these initials in street names etc. Good job Jack was not Polish then or he'd still be killing now haha. It sort of makes me realise why I 'left' Casebook and the forums when all of this was going down...

Wonder what she is doing now?