He gave the police his name

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JadenCollins
    Detective
    • Aug 2014
    • 215

    #121
    Instead of discussing "Pierre" in public, let's pm each other, because we all know how much he likes to stalk every post! He simply enjoys it! Just pm each other if ya'll wanna say something! We've clearly given him too much attention, he'll keep on making pointless threads, Pierre's an attention seeker!
    “If I cannot bend heaven, I will raise hell.”

    Comment

    • GUT
      Commissioner
      • Jan 2014
      • 7841

      #122
      Originally posted by Rosella View Post
      It probably is. I've long since lost the plot about what Pierre means about anything. It's like trying to grasp a handful of mist. I just wish he'd stop with the metaphorical nonsense and the pseudo-intellectual BS and state what he actually means in his epistles in plain everyday English.
      Well you can live in hope.
      G U T

      There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

      Comment

      • GUT
        Commissioner
        • Jan 2014
        • 7841

        #123
        Originally posted by John G View Post
        I may be mistaken, but it seems to me that Pierre's theory is almost entirely dependent on his subjective interpretation of metaphorical language contained in communications sent, purportedly, by the killer.

        Now some of these communications he claims have a "low validity". However, clearly not the communication, or "data source", that is the subject of this thread: despite the suspect's name appearing in only metaphorical form Pierre confidently asserts: "There is now hardly any doubt. I must have found him."

        Is that a reasonable assessment? Or am I missing something?
        Seems to me what he's doing is making rubbish up then twisting things to fit saying we can't see it because it's metaphorical and we all ain't academic giants like he are.
        G U T

        There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

        Comment

        • IchabodCrane
          Detective
          • Mar 2008
          • 197

          #124
          Pierre, how about your statistical analysis to find the probability of the killer's metaphorical name being in your data source? Was it higher than 0.1% after all?
          Maybe I missed a thread or two in between, but I feel there are many loose ends to tie up first before starting new Chapman threads.

          Comment

          • Pierre
            Inactive
            • Sep 2015
            • 4407

            #125
            Originally posted by IchabodCrane View Post
            Pierre, how about your statistical analysis to find the probability of the killer's metaphorical name being in your data source? Was it higher than 0.1% after all?
            Maybe I missed a thread or two in between, but I feel there are many loose ends to tie up first before starting new Chapman threads.
            Hi,

            Thanks a lot for reminding me. I will update you as soon as I have made it.

            Regards, Pierre

            Comment

            • Bridewell
              Commissioner
              • Apr 2011
              • 4038

              #126
              Perhaps he gave them his address as well, Pierre:-

              Click image for larger version

Name:	Buckle St.JPG
Views:	2
Size:	85.2 KB
ID:	666771

              I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

              Comment

              • Mike J. G.
                Sergeant
                • May 2017
                • 843

                #127
                God, the whole Pierre saga was one boring load of bollocks. Did he ever come up with an actual suspect from "the data"?

                Comment

                • Geddy2112
                  Inspector
                  • Dec 2015
                  • 1301

                  #128
                  Originally posted by Mike J. G. View Post
                  God, the whole Pierre saga was one boring load of bollocks. Did he ever come up with an actual suspect from "the data"?
                  'She' I believe, Kristina Nordqvist. She is acknowledged as helping Steve Blomer with his Inside Bucks Row Book. I think, but not 100% ended up with Kosminski but I can certainly in my younger years here remember her touting a PC. I think I left because of the whole Pierre goings on.

                  The book we've all been waiting for! Screenshot_2.png I've purchased and I'm awaiting electronic delivery to my email. We might soon have an answer to that burning question; 'Who is Pierre's suspect?'
                  Last edited by Geddy2112; 07-03-2024, 03:04 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Ms Diddles
                    Chief Inspector
                    • Aug 2019
                    • 1693

                    #129
                    Originally posted by Mike J. G. View Post
                    God, the whole Pierre saga was one boring load of bollocks. Did he ever come up with an actual suspect from "the data"?
                    I may be wrong about this, but didn't the data ultimately lead Pierre to the door of Caroline Maxwell's other half?!

                    I think that was her theory anyway (and the data never lies!).

                    Comment

                    • Geddy2112
                      Inspector
                      • Dec 2015
                      • 1301

                      #130
                      OMG I've just read the thread about her book, dear God. That's an hour I'll never get back. All these initials in street names etc. Good job Jack was not Polish then or he'd still be killing now haha. It sort of makes me realise why I 'left' Casebook and the forums when all of this was going down...

                      Wonder what she is doing now?

                      Comment

                      • Mike J. G.
                        Sergeant
                        • May 2017
                        • 843

                        #131
                        Originally posted by Geddy2112 View Post

                        'She' I believe, Kristina Nordqvist. She is acknowledged as helping Steve Blomer with his Inside Bucks Row Book. I think, but not 100% ended up with Kosminski but I can certainly in my younger years here remember her touting a PC. I think I left because of the whole Pierre goings on.

                        https://forum.casebook.org/forum/rip...ist-aka-pierre
                        Never had him pegged as a her! Interesting. She just went about her business in such an odd fashion, endless waffling about vague sources and "following data" that I presumed it was someone taking the piss.

                        Comment

                        • Mike J. G.
                          Sergeant
                          • May 2017
                          • 843

                          #132
                          Originally posted by Ms Diddles View Post

                          I may be wrong about this, but didn't the data ultimately lead Pierre to the door of Caroline Maxwell's other half?!

                          I think that was her theory anyway (and the data never lies!).
                          I'm not sure, but it all feels very anticlimactic! I thought Pierre was gonna blow the bloody doors off Ripperology.

                          Comment

                          • Geddy2112
                            Inspector
                            • Dec 2015
                            • 1301

                            #133
                            Originally posted by Mike J. G. View Post

                            I'm not sure, but it all feels very anticlimactic! I thought Pierre was gonna blow the bloody doors off Ripperology.
                            It does, but I was more active in the thick of it all and it was quite a chore reading these very pages. Not sure why she left and I was not there at the huge unveiling as at that point I'd ran out of hot pins to stick in my eyeballs. It seems to have gone full circle now with Lechmere taking over the mantle...

                            Comment

                            • John Wheat
                              Assistant Commissioner
                              • Jul 2008
                              • 3347

                              #134
                              Originally posted by Geddy2112 View Post

                              It does, but I was more active in the thick of it all and it was quite a chore reading these very pages. Not sure why she left and I was not there at the huge unveiling as at that point I'd ran out of hot pins to stick in my eyeballs. It seems to have gone full circle now with Lechmere taking over the mantle...
                              Hi Geddy2112

                              Is that the bullshit mantle?

                              Cheers John

                              Comment

                              • Geddy2112
                                Inspector
                                • Dec 2015
                                • 1301

                                #135
                                Originally posted by John Wheat View Post

                                Hi Geddy2112

                                Is that the bullshit mantle?

                                Cheers John
                                I guess so yes

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X