Originally posted by Christine
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ethical question - Misogyny on these boards
Collapse
X
-
Dan Norder
Ripper Notes: The International Journal for Ripper Studies
Web site: www.RipperNotes.com - Email: dannorder@gmail.com
-
Well, yes, John, my eloquence is well known when I drink alcohol.
And my venom.
I used to be an alcoholic, but these days I'm just a drunk.
In my younger days I gave myself unbridled and uncontrolled access to alcohol where I achieved little else apart from getting drunk, fortunately I had the funds to indulge such an expensive habit. Which does make me wonder how alcoholics fuel their passion, now and then?
They can't work, so they must rely on some other device to survive... like prostitution perhaps?
Or being a writer?
At some point in my life, I think at forty when I had a stroke, brought on by port, sherry and brandy, I decided to exercise some control over my demons, and banished them from my life, apart from between the hours of 6pm and midnight; and since then have successfully contributed to society in a positive fashion, and am now a successful business man, as well as an author with a few titles to my name.
I made a choice.
I'm sure that anyone can make that simple choice.
To split the demon in half.
I never want to give up being a drunk, but I never want to go back and be an alcoholic.
Simply put, I used to use alcohol to make things vanish, but now I use alcohol to make things appear... like this post.
Comment
-
Well said Cap'n. As with any type of addiction, I suspect the sufferer (or 'offender' where others are affected) needs a powerful reason to cut down or cut out his/her poison. The short sharp shock of your stroke did the trick for you.
For others it might be the threat of their home being repossessed or losing their partner or child. On our wedding anniversary a few years back, I finally plucked up all my courage and told hubby to take his gin bottle and go and live with his mum if he honestly thought that hitting the hard stuff every night was not slowly poisoning his relationships with his nearest and dearest. I had to mean it and he had to know I meant it. He hasn't touched spirits from that day to this and 'restricts' himself to cider and red wine, which just makes him sleepy instead of turning him into Mr Hyde. I've got my Dr Jekyll back but I defy anyone to say it's easy or quick or painless.
For a Whitechapel unfortunate, with precious little to live for anyway, even the short sharp shock of hearing about the latest murder, and wondering who would be next on the lord high executioner's little list, was clearly not going to make the comfort provided by a tot of gin worth sacrificing.
Love,
Caz
XLast edited by caz; 06-19-2008, 11:44 AM."Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov
Comment
-
Originally posted by truebluedub View PostHi everyone,
considering recent comments on another thread http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=870 should we be concerned that some people are displaying intolerance towards women.
In my own view we should.
kind regards,
Chris Lowe
I havent seen any of these threads you mention nor do I want to but while I personally cannot speak for everyone, I do feel I represent the vast majority of students interested in the Whitechapel Murders when I say the primary interest in Jack the Ripper is the whodunnit aspect and the inherent romance of the great Victorian mystery and not the fact that he murdered 5 women.
Ripperologist communities, I suspect, make for easy targets regarding accussations of sexism and misogony and its this stereotype that grinds me, personally, the most. In truth I think its best to dismiss the afore mentioned threads as the work of very small minds.
I would also like to add that in recent years the publication of several Ripper books written by female authors has done the case the world of good.
Comment
-
Originally posted by caz View PostHi Nats,
Actually, I was doing the opposite of judging the victims on the basis of what they did to earn money. Jack judged them to be expendable and it was his weakness for murder and mutilation that doomed them. I certainly don't blame them in their circumstances if they took to drink to dull their senses when they could see no way out of their situation. That does not even begin to compare with the selfish gits who are a million times better off in every possible way than those women were in 1888, but abuse alcohol today (or drugs or food or whatever) while their families suffer all the consequences.
It was just astonishingly bad luck (like the reverse of winning the lottery if you like) that they were the 'unfortunates' to encounter a serial killer, out of all the others like them who just carried on living their miserable lives in poverty until they died some other way. I would no more judge the victims for selling their orifices to survive another day than I would judge the match girls for selling their jaws and hoping not to get a 'phossy' one in the process. Both occupations involved men taking immoral advantage of women's bits, and both were likely to cause suffering and premature death.
I think it only adds insult to injury when some people today choose to ignore the evidence that a Whitechapel victim only got her throat cut because she had the huge misfortune to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and instead seek to conjure up all kinds of unsupported scenarios involving a wronged boyfriend getting even.
Love,
Caz
XWe are all born cute as a button and dumb as rocks. We grow out of cute fast!
Comment
Comment