Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

JTR Museum

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Observer View Post
    It wasn't until Edwards was mentioned that you suddenly thought oh yeah he's the first person who came to my mind. You'd already stated some other crackpot was trying to peddle a theory. Obviously, in your mind someone other than Edwards. So I'm saying he was not the first person who came to your mind.
    No my first though was, "sounds like what Edwards tried to pull"

    But I simply didn't believe he would be brazen enough to try it all over again.

    But I am truly amazed at your ability to read minds over the internet.

    And as for your BS well I really couldn't care less what you think of me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Observer
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Still waiting to hear how saying when I sad that it was probably to sell some other crack pot theory I wasn't aware it was Edwards is a cop out.

    Doesn't seem that everyone else knows as you thought they would either.
    It wasn't until Edwards was mentioned that you suddenly thought oh yeah he's the first person who came to my mind. You'd already stated some other crackpot was trying to peddle a theory. Obviously, in your mind someone other than Edwards. So I'm saying he was not the first person who came to your mind.

    Leave a comment:


  • Observer
    replied
    Originally posted by El White Chap View Post
    Oh you are just two tons of fun aren't cha.

    If a poster has an opinion on another individual involved in the world of The Whitechapel Murders then they are more than within their own right to state their opinion.

    You should take more after your own username and less after a plonker, eh petal.
    You want to mind your own business petal

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Still waiting to hear how saying when I sad that it was probably to sell some other crack pot theory I wasn't aware it was Edwards is a cop out.

    Doesn't seem that everyone else knows as you thought they would either.

    Leave a comment:


  • El White Chap
    replied
    Originally posted by Observer View Post
    Don't get you started on the Michelmas daisies. Believe me, it doesn't need you much to "get started", where Mr Edwards is concerned. Edwards produced a book, not dissimilar in inaccuracies to many Ripper authors, it's the genre. Get over it. He produced a book made some money. I'll tell you what, I'll start a thread discussing Stephen Knights book, and you can pull that to bits as well.
    Oh you are just two tons of fun aren't cha.

    If a poster has an opinion on another individual involved in the world of The Whitechapel Murders then they are more than within their own right to state their opinion.

    You should take more after your own username and less after a plonker, eh petal.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Steadmund Brand View Post
    Look.. the real question here is... did anyone try Mr. Edwards jellybeans???
    and can you buy just black ones......

    Ya know, I'm all for someone trying to make a buck...even those with the best intentions are doing that.... but I'm with GUT.. the whole "case solved" thing gets under my skin.....especially when he...fudged the science (trying to stay polite)

    And to be honest.. the museum does look to be fascinating… I know that if I get back to London I would love to take the walk and see it…..even if it is Mr. Edwards…. To be fair I don’t know him, have never met him, for all I know he is a great guy….who knows

    Steadmund Brand
    I agree I'd glady sit down and have a drink with him he may be a great guy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Steadmund Brand
    replied
    Look.. the real question here is... did anyone try Mr. Edwards jellybeans???
    and can you buy just black ones......

    Ya know, I'm all for someone trying to make a buck...even those with the best intentions are doing that.... but I'm with GUT.. the whole "case solved" thing gets under my skin.....especially when he...fudged the science (trying to stay polite)

    And to be honest.. the museum does look to be fascinating… I know that if I get back to London I would love to take the walk and see it…..even if it is Mr. Edwards…. To be fair I don’t know him, have never met him, for all I know he is a great guy….who knows

    Steadmund Brand

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Observer View Post
    I'll tell you what, I'll start a thread discussing Stephen Knights book, and you can pull that to bits as well.
    Happy to cast a critical eye over anyone who says they have solved it.

    After all the only way the truth about anything is ever found is by taking a long hard look at the claims made.

    If my best friend, or even my wife [actually they are one and the same], was to claim "case solved" I along with many others woud be looking for holes in the theory they presented.

    If once the holes were pointed out they chose to bury their head and ignore the problems I'd be saying the same things.

    Leave a comment:


  • Observer
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    I have no idea what you mean.
    I'm sure most of the posters who read these exchanges can work it out, I'm not going to explain it to you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Observer
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Actually I don't know the man.

    What I don't like is that he mis-stated the science and still tries to claim it as valid.

    Coupled with the fact that he has produced not on iota of proof that the "shawl" was ever anywhere near the crime scene.

    And don't get me started on his Michaelmas daisy junk, the pattern is nothing even remotely resembling daisies, but we can't let the truth get in the way of peddling a story.

    And now he is trying to sell the piece of material for the best part of three mill.
    Don't get you started on the Michelmas daisies. Believe me, it doesn't need you much to "get started", where Mr Edwards is concerned. Edwards produced a book, not dissimilar in inaccuracies to many Ripper authors, it's the genre. Get over it. He produced a book made some money. I'll tell you what, I'll start a thread discussing Stephen Knights book, and you can pull that to bits as well.
    Last edited by Observer; 07-23-2015, 04:26 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Observer View Post
    Good cop out
    I have no idea what you mean.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Observer View Post
    You don't like Mr Edwards do you
    Actually I don't know the man.

    What I don't like is that he mis-stated the science and still tries to claim it as valid.

    Coupled with the fact that he has produced not on iota of proof that the "shawl" was ever anywhere near the crime scene.

    And don't get me started on his Michaelmas daisy junk, the pattern is nothing even remotely resembling daisies, but we can't let the truth get in the way of peddling a story.

    And now he is trying to sell the piece of material for the best part of three mill.

    Leave a comment:


  • Observer
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    When I made the 1st post I wasn't sure it was Edwards, it just seemed so similar to his opening his shop of yoyos and jelly beans just before his book hit.
    Good cop out

    Leave a comment:


  • Observer
    replied
    You don't like Mr Edwards do you

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Observer View Post
    Regarding Mr Edwards, isn't that somewhat contradictory ?
    When I made the 1st post I wasn't sure it was Edwards, it just seemed so similar to his opening his shop of yoyos and jelly beans just before his book hit.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X