If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Unfortunately, for that theory, Kate's inclusion was doubted, almost from the beginning.
Where do you suppose Baxter got his information?
Cheers.
LC
Then what of the policemen of the time, and the countless modern researchers who subscribe to the canonical murder? Where did they get THEIR information?
Over the years some people have tried to make this case far more complicated than it actually was .We've had various conspiracy theories suggested ranging from the far fetched to the plain deluded.One man for reasons best known to himself decided to commit these vile crimes we will never know who or why but I do think it is the work of one man he wasn't a superman he played his luck and if something hadn't happend to him after poor Mary's murder he would have been caught eventually.p.s I think we all agree he didn't take a shawl to the murder sites with him.
Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
Over the years some people have tried to make this case far more complicated than it actually was .We've had various conspiracy theories suggested ranging from the far fetched to the plain deluded.One man for reasons best known to himself decided to commit these vile crimes we will never know who or why but I do think it is the work of one man he wasn't a superman he played his luck and if something hadn't happend to him after poor Mary's murder he would have been caught eventually.p.s I think we all agree he didn't take a shawl to the murder sites with him.
I think the problem with Ripperology is that some people are always trying to look outside the box and invent their own pet theories. There's nothing wrong with doing that per se, but it does needlessly complicate the case to start throwing in multiple killers when one will suffice.
I think the problem with Ripperology is that some people are always trying to look outside the box and invent their own pet theories. There's nothing wrong with doing that per se, but it does needlessly complicate the case to start throwing in multiple killers when one will suffice.
Yeah why have one killer when you can have five or six in the same area, with very similar m.o.'s?
Ted Bundy would literally run around a dormitory trying to bludgeon and murder everyone there. There was even a double event at a lake. So its not exclusive to the Whitechapel murders at all.
"There's nothing wrong with doing that per se, but it does needlessly complicate the case to start throwing in multiple killers when one will suffice."
And why stop there? Let's let him kill ALL the ladies who died in London from, say, 1885 to 1892.
Maybe they were neither less nor more skillful, but described - and judged - by a different surgeon?
That might have played a part and also the fact that there was some measure of light in Hanbury Street versus the nearly absolute absence of light in Mitre Square.
Comment