Jack the Ripper: Man or Myth?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Harry D
    *
    • May 2014
    • 3360

    #31
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Harry. Thanks.

    Unfortunately, for that theory, Kate's inclusion was doubted, almost from the beginning.

    Where do you suppose Baxter got his information?

    Cheers.
    LC
    Then what of the policemen of the time, and the countless modern researchers who subscribe to the canonical murder? Where did they get THEIR information?

    Comment

    • pinkmoon
      Chief Inspector
      • Jul 2013
      • 1813

      #32
      Over the years some people have tried to make this case far more complicated than it actually was .We've had various conspiracy theories suggested ranging from the far fetched to the plain deluded.One man for reasons best known to himself decided to commit these vile crimes we will never know who or why but I do think it is the work of one man he wasn't a superman he played his luck and if something hadn't happend to him after poor Mary's murder he would have been caught eventually.p.s I think we all agree he didn't take a shawl to the murder sites with him.
      Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth

      Comment

      • Harry D
        *
        • May 2014
        • 3360

        #33
        Originally posted by pinkmoon View Post
        Over the years some people have tried to make this case far more complicated than it actually was .We've had various conspiracy theories suggested ranging from the far fetched to the plain deluded.One man for reasons best known to himself decided to commit these vile crimes we will never know who or why but I do think it is the work of one man he wasn't a superman he played his luck and if something hadn't happend to him after poor Mary's murder he would have been caught eventually.p.s I think we all agree he didn't take a shawl to the murder sites with him.
        I think the problem with Ripperology is that some people are always trying to look outside the box and invent their own pet theories. There's nothing wrong with doing that per se, but it does needlessly complicate the case to start throwing in multiple killers when one will suffice.

        Comment

        • John Wheat
          Assistant Commissioner
          • Jul 2008
          • 3397

          #34
          Originally posted by Harry D View Post
          I think the problem with Ripperology is that some people are always trying to look outside the box and invent their own pet theories. There's nothing wrong with doing that per se, but it does needlessly complicate the case to start throwing in multiple killers when one will suffice.
          Yeah why have one killer when you can have five or six in the same area, with very similar m.o.'s?

          Cheers John

          Comment

          • Rosella
            Chief Inspector
            • Sep 2014
            • 1542

            #35
            Maybe Jack had multiple personalities.

            Comment

            • Batman
              Superintendent
              • Jan 2013
              • 2931

              #36
              Ted Bundy would literally run around a dormitory trying to bludgeon and murder everyone there. There was even a double event at a lake. So its not exclusive to the Whitechapel murders at all.
              Bona fide canonical and then some.

              Comment

              • lynn cates
                Commisioner
                • Aug 2009
                • 13841

                #37
                investigating

                Hello Harry. Thanks.

                Which policemen? Tom Arnold perhaps? He held 4.

                Whence his information? Well, he actually did some investigating. Much better than listening to a lot of talking heads.

                Cheers.
                LC

                Comment

                • lynn cates
                  Commisioner
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 13841

                  #38
                  decided

                  Hello Jason. Why "decided"?

                  Cheers.
                  LC

                  Comment

                  • lynn cates
                    Commisioner
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 13841

                    #39
                    Don't stop when you're on a roll.

                    Hello Harry.

                    "There's nothing wrong with doing that per se, but it does needlessly complicate the case to start throwing in multiple killers when one will suffice."

                    And why stop there? Let's let him kill ALL the ladies who died in London from, say, 1885 to 1892.

                    Cheers.
                    LC

                    Comment

                    • Batman
                      Superintendent
                      • Jan 2013
                      • 2931

                      #40
                      Ipswitch killer was another.

                      5 dead prostitutes
                      Span of killings
                      30 October 2006–10 December 2006
                      Bona fide canonical and then some.

                      Comment

                      • K-453
                        Detective
                        • Aug 2011
                        • 210

                        #41
                        Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
                        If they were the same, why were the cuts unskilful in Kate's case?
                        Maybe they were neither less nor more skillful, but described - and judged - by a different surgeon?

                        Comment

                        • gnote
                          Detective
                          • Nov 2014
                          • 195

                          #42
                          Originally posted by K-453 View Post
                          Maybe they were neither less nor more skillful, but described - and judged - by a different surgeon?
                          And/or had slightly different circumstances.

                          Comment

                          • Tom_Wescott
                            Commissioner
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 7001

                            #43
                            Originally posted by K-453 View Post
                            Maybe they were neither less nor more skillful, but described - and judged - by a different surgeon?
                            That might have played a part and also the fact that there was some measure of light in Hanbury Street versus the nearly absolute absence of light in Mitre Square.

                            Yours truly,

                            Tom Wescott

                            Comment

                            • lynn cates
                              Commisioner
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 13841

                              #44
                              mistaken

                              Hello K. Thanks.

                              No, both were Phillips/Baxter pronouncements.

                              It one wishes to go THAT route, why not just say Phillips was mistaken or incompetent?

                              Cheers.
                              LC

                              Comment

                              • lynn cates
                                Commisioner
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 13841

                                #45
                                Buck's Row

                                Hello Tom. What of Buck's Row?

                                Cheers.
                                LC

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X