Originally posted by lynn cates
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Jack the Ripper: Man or Myth?
Collapse
X
-
Over the years some people have tried to make this case far more complicated than it actually was .We've had various conspiracy theories suggested ranging from the far fetched to the plain deluded.One man for reasons best known to himself decided to commit these vile crimes we will never know who or why but I do think it is the work of one man he wasn't a superman he played his luck and if something hadn't happend to him after poor Mary's murder he would have been caught eventually.p.s I think we all agree he didn't take a shawl to the murder sites with him.Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
Comment
-
Originally posted by pinkmoon View PostOver the years some people have tried to make this case far more complicated than it actually was .We've had various conspiracy theories suggested ranging from the far fetched to the plain deluded.One man for reasons best known to himself decided to commit these vile crimes we will never know who or why but I do think it is the work of one man he wasn't a superman he played his luck and if something hadn't happend to him after poor Mary's murder he would have been caught eventually.p.s I think we all agree he didn't take a shawl to the murder sites with him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harry D View PostI think the problem with Ripperology is that some people are always trying to look outside the box and invent their own pet theories. There's nothing wrong with doing that per se, but it does needlessly complicate the case to start throwing in multiple killers when one will suffice.
Cheers John
Comment
-
Don't stop when you're on a roll.
Hello Harry.
"There's nothing wrong with doing that per se, but it does needlessly complicate the case to start throwing in multiple killers when one will suffice."
And why stop there? Let's let him kill ALL the ladies who died in London from, say, 1885 to 1892.
Cheers.
LC
Comment
-
Originally posted by K-453 View PostMaybe they were neither less nor more skillful, but described - and judged - by a different surgeon?
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Comment
Comment