Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Family man or Bachelor boy?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Scott Nelson View Post

    Could he even play a bass guitar?

    I don't think so Scott since the first bass guitar was developed in 1930 by musician Paul Tutmarc of Seattle, Washington.

    He could have played Bass saxophone though..

    Speaking of which I recommend: Bass Saxophone

    playin´ the beast



    The Baron

    Comment


    • #17
      When I saw the post title, I thought it was something to do with Cliff Richard.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Darryl Kenyon View Post

        I would err on the side that he was probably single but this is a very good point. Sonia Sutcliffe, wife of the Yorkshire ripper certainly was in denial, constantly giving him alibi's , telling the police Peter wasn't the ripper and leave us alone, after at least one interview etc. Even after he admitted his offences she couldn't take it in properly.

        Also i believe one of the three leading forensic psychologists in the country who the police use [ sorry her name escapes me ] , believes that the ripper was possibly married but his relationship was not the norm , similar to the Sutcliffe's with Sonia being diagnosed as being schizophrenic.

        Could a break up of his marriage have sent Jack down his destructive path ? Especially if his wife had to prostitute herself ?

        Regards Darryl
        Such an excellent post Darryl and precisely why I initiated this particular thread.

        RD
        "Great minds, don't think alike"

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by The Rookie Detective View Post

          Such an excellent post Darryl and precisely why I initiated this particular thread.
          You guys should check out Murder Most Foul in Ripperologist 153 (part 1) and 154 (part 2). We look at this stuff and a whole lot more.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by The Rookie Detective View Post

            Such an excellent post Darryl and precisely why I initiated this particular thread.

            RD
            Thank you RD

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Darryl Kenyon View Post

              I would err on the side that he was probably single but this is a very good point. Sonia Sutcliffe, wife of the Yorkshire ripper certainly was in denial, constantly giving him alibi's , telling the police Peter wasn't the ripper and leave us alone, after at least one interview etc. Even after he admitted his offences she couldn't take it in properly.

              Also i believe one of the three leading forensic psychologists in the country who the police use [ sorry her name escapes me ] , believes that the ripper was possibly married but his relationship was not the norm , similar to the Sutcliffe's with Sonia being diagnosed as being schizophrenic.

              Could a break up of his marriage have sent Jack down his destructive path ? Especially if his wife had to prostitute herself ?

              Regards Darryl
              Of course Jack's wife might have been a prostitute before he met her.

              Comment


              • #22
                No way of knowing but I guess I always thought maybe unmarried.
                " Still it is an error to argue in front of your data. You find yourself insensibly twisting them round to fit your theories."
                Sherlock Holmes
                ​​​​​

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Duran duren View Post
                  No way of knowing but I guess I always thought maybe unmarried.
                  Welcome to Casebook. (A first post should always generate a response).
                  I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Perhaps married to a domineering wife and attacking unfortunates as a form of murder by proxy. I'm not suggesting that's how it was, just that it is a possible scenario.
                    I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Duran duren View Post
                      No way of knowing but I guess I always thought maybe unmarried.
                      Welcome to Casebook!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Bridewell View Post

                        Welcome to Casebook. (A first post should always generate a response).
                        Thank you...
                        " Still it is an error to argue in front of your data. You find yourself insensibly twisting them round to fit your theories."
                        Sherlock Holmes
                        ​​​​​

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Lewis C View Post

                          Welcome to Casebook!
                          Thank you...
                          " Still it is an error to argue in front of your data. You find yourself insensibly twisting them round to fit your theories."
                          Sherlock Holmes
                          ​​​​​

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I gave always felt the Ripper was probably a Robert Napper type person. A loner who was seen as eccentric but harmless. The nature of the murders and the different times the murders were committed speaks to me of someone uninhibited by a partner who may be suspicious of his absences. But of course we will never know for sure. If I had to bet on it though I would suggest unmarried and living alone.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X