Family man or Bachelor boy?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Baron
    Chief Inspector
    • Feb 2019
    • 1501

    #16
    Originally posted by Scott Nelson View Post

    Could he even play a bass guitar?

    I don't think so Scott since the first bass guitar was developed in 1930 by musician Paul Tutmarc of Seattle, Washington.

    He could have played Bass saxophone though..

    Speaking of which I recommend: Bass Saxophone

    playin´ the beast



    The Baron

    Comment

    • barnflatwyngarde
      Inspector
      • Sep 2014
      • 1163

      #17
      When I saw the post title, I thought it was something to do with Cliff Richard.

      Comment

      • The Rookie Detective
        Chief Inspector
        • Apr 2019
        • 1930

        #18
        Originally posted by Darryl Kenyon View Post

        I would err on the side that he was probably single but this is a very good point. Sonia Sutcliffe, wife of the Yorkshire ripper certainly was in denial, constantly giving him alibi's , telling the police Peter wasn't the ripper and leave us alone, after at least one interview etc. Even after he admitted his offences she couldn't take it in properly.

        Also i believe one of the three leading forensic psychologists in the country who the police use [ sorry her name escapes me ] , believes that the ripper was possibly married but his relationship was not the norm , similar to the Sutcliffe's with Sonia being diagnosed as being schizophrenic.

        Could a break up of his marriage have sent Jack down his destructive path ? Especially if his wife had to prostitute herself ?

        Regards Darryl
        Such an excellent post Darryl and precisely why I initiated this particular thread.

        RD
        "Great minds, don't think alike"

        Comment

        • Scott Nelson
          Superintendent
          • Feb 2008
          • 2437

          #19
          Originally posted by The Rookie Detective View Post

          Such an excellent post Darryl and precisely why I initiated this particular thread.
          You guys should check out Murder Most Foul in Ripperologist 153 (part 1) and 154 (part 2). We look at this stuff and a whole lot more.

          Comment

          • Darryl Kenyon
            Inspector
            • Nov 2014
            • 1248

            #20
            Originally posted by The Rookie Detective View Post

            Such an excellent post Darryl and precisely why I initiated this particular thread.

            RD
            Thank you RD

            Comment

            • John Wheat
              Assistant Commissioner
              • Jul 2008
              • 3409

              #21
              Originally posted by Darryl Kenyon View Post

              I would err on the side that he was probably single but this is a very good point. Sonia Sutcliffe, wife of the Yorkshire ripper certainly was in denial, constantly giving him alibi's , telling the police Peter wasn't the ripper and leave us alone, after at least one interview etc. Even after he admitted his offences she couldn't take it in properly.

              Also i believe one of the three leading forensic psychologists in the country who the police use [ sorry her name escapes me ] , believes that the ripper was possibly married but his relationship was not the norm , similar to the Sutcliffe's with Sonia being diagnosed as being schizophrenic.

              Could a break up of his marriage have sent Jack down his destructive path ? Especially if his wife had to prostitute herself ?

              Regards Darryl
              Of course Jack's wife might have been a prostitute before he met her.

              Comment

              • Duran duren
                Constable
                • Apr 2024
                • 72

                #22
                No way of knowing but I guess I always thought maybe unmarried.
                " Still it is an error to argue in front of your data. You find yourself insensibly twisting them round to fit your theories."
                Sherlock Holmes
                ​​​​​

                Comment

                • Bridewell
                  Commissioner
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 4039

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Duran duren View Post
                  No way of knowing but I guess I always thought maybe unmarried.
                  Welcome to Casebook. (A first post should always generate a response).
                  I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                  Comment

                  • Bridewell
                    Commissioner
                    • Apr 2011
                    • 4039

                    #24
                    Perhaps married to a domineering wife and attacking unfortunates as a form of murder by proxy. I'm not suggesting that's how it was, just that it is a possible scenario.
                    I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                    Comment

                    • Lewis C
                      Inspector
                      • Dec 2022
                      • 1176

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Duran duren View Post
                      No way of knowing but I guess I always thought maybe unmarried.
                      Welcome to Casebook!

                      Comment

                      • Duran duren
                        Constable
                        • Apr 2024
                        • 72

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Bridewell View Post

                        Welcome to Casebook. (A first post should always generate a response).
                        Thank you...
                        " Still it is an error to argue in front of your data. You find yourself insensibly twisting them round to fit your theories."
                        Sherlock Holmes
                        ​​​​​

                        Comment

                        • Duran duren
                          Constable
                          • Apr 2024
                          • 72

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Lewis C View Post

                          Welcome to Casebook!
                          Thank you...
                          " Still it is an error to argue in front of your data. You find yourself insensibly twisting them round to fit your theories."
                          Sherlock Holmes
                          ​​​​​

                          Comment

                          • Sunny Delight
                            Sergeant
                            • Dec 2017
                            • 767

                            #28
                            I gave always felt the Ripper was probably a Robert Napper type person. A loner who was seen as eccentric but harmless. The nature of the murders and the different times the murders were committed speaks to me of someone uninhibited by a partner who may be suspicious of his absences. But of course we will never know for sure. If I had to bet on it though I would suggest unmarried and living alone.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X