Originally posted by 23Skidoo
View Post
Originally posted by 23Skidoo
View Post
Originally posted by 23Skidoo
View Post
Originally posted by 23Skidoo
View Post
Originally posted by 23Skidoo
View Post
I don't see at all why the scientific method would have a problem with meanings in context. There certainly might be practical problems as the number of variables explodes, but this is not a problem with the method. What's more, you can narrow things down to 'Mars opposite Venus in relation to (whatever)' and if you can find enough examples of that, you should be able to make some sort of probabilistic conclusion.
Originally posted by 23Skidoo
View Post
Originally posted by 23Skidoo
View Post
The main reason these things are NOT being done is that astrology has failed much simpler tests, over and over again. It is not because scientists are determinists and materialists, or incapable of setting factors in context, or because it's a whole lot of work. It's because everyone who has sat down to do the hard work has eventually given it up as useless.
So if you really think there's something to this, then you have the opportunity to save lives and better society, and scientists will take you seriously if you come up with hard data and then you'll have lots of people who are willing to help you out. So, how about it?
Comment