Hypothesis: There was no Serial Killer murdering women in Whitechapel, London in 1888. Whether nicknamed Jack the Ripper or not doesn't matter. Was there a serial murderer?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NoJak
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post14% is higher than I expected.Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
It's still a pretty small sample size, Herlock. At time of writing, that 14% might represent the only two people here who don't believe there was an SK at work!
Has David Icke voted yet?Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Roy Corduroy View PostEarly results show them running neck and neck but this poll will stay open to infinity and beyond. So jump in!
Remember you vote is anonymous. Just like the real thing.
Roy
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jon Guy View Post
I voted YES. But, if the NO`s win can we have a second, People`s Vote ? Just like the real thing.
I hope this clears up any confusion regarding the matter.Last edited by John G; 06-14-2019, 11:57 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by John G View Post
I'm afraid not, Jon. NoJack means NoJack. It doesn't, for instance, mean "perhaps Jack". Importantly, a second referendum, in these circumstances, would clearly be an absolute betrayal of the expressed will of the Caaebook fraternity. Neither would it be democratic. As a general rule, people are not allowed to change their minds in a democracy. It just isn't cricket. However, if the "Yes" vote is successful then, of course, a second People's vote would be acceptable, probably even desirable, especially as there is clear precedent to allow a second vote in these circumstances, i.e. second referendum on Scottish independence, second referendum on Brexit, following defeats for these proposals in the mid 70's.
I hope this clears up any confusion regarding the matter.
But, being a modern man, I will stamp and stamp my feet until I get the result I want.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mpriestnall View PostI voted Yes for a serial killer. I have my own candidate, doh!
However, I still think the police/politicians knew more about the murders than they admitted and may have distorted the public
conception of them, perhaps using the newspapers to do so.
Martyn
whos your suspect and why do you suspect him?"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jon Guy View Post
Yes, thanks for clarifying matters, John.
But, being a modern man, I will stamp and stamp my feet until I get the result I want.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
Comment